IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-iana-cons-04: (with COMMENT)

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Tue, 05 October 2021 02:30 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E2EF3A0E57; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 19:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hMZU17FbSPwA; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 19:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa33.google.com (mail-vk1-xa33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9900C3A0E54; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 19:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa33.google.com with SMTP id f126so7953247vke.3; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 19:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2+JCNUG0qM0d4ykNQSAdElcdTRYqU1lVTY4wbyuGfp4=; b=cf1FOOCpcsYnkkts8Wl4I4k4wkF4EUHqzsoLWXrWydVPNXtT+TgMrB2kV4cPU74TrD a6gr1LxeZ0W/4j9XRV7kqhOrtcq58GKpQxZ+Et2kYzHYvrrTKYf/xsDsGOqhiUUlsIQH QBhwQbgN90Lo4G3SaIjwOOKs0lfPAGoMvX/okYSliGI9EAmg2Dw2IOYSmeHwdZpyednO /cjnkToDnJfkzczrrKeKCQQ/A+fDMs/OpxjF+Rtcf5kcUW9jtrZ1a8KFxRCd7VWf9EvW Sj4wedPNEGV7L8hSAuYj1oaV8g65oozxQLDoH5AGg17Kcx6xd6D1NgyZ5h7XAx937Cg8 8PSg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2+JCNUG0qM0d4ykNQSAdElcdTRYqU1lVTY4wbyuGfp4=; b=Re1A5r/rGuhA4wlb1HswF18Nzs1DgxsS7YpKAKBukZFYfsOEyRuzLrsiSkV67BENMg ZKafN889y0S4edu42bRr+B8hsxAJVXTlWwKt+BbsXKcA/L91538ekGPgUOddiwo2rGlM F4vP9Qs3ndmuFbpFqTfC+NJcXCTTrt307lya2ZCAFP+Hjug8j0wYbC1Nje2xNIQVrYpL jL0R4PsLrOOd5eE93ndBVT695eplUhPMwEewe88tCkseWEs4AlQIGVFlJAIantVAaeSS eo93aYHjHm3VweALZtTBpaWBpXEifO6R//3v+rNfPWCZUAf5XhDP8TFsvHHHD9iWfqcI c+2w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Pl7T5w7yk3JEBd15He4B7530KqY+q8QVxRJTIPmbINL3cg/TM jzneygufza5vcNMjUvJ3ZuE9b9tvqyj1eK40kDM8hNzF
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzenHiZMkZuhC602/yuxH4ig5U5emth3ak3b7dSBdoB8Niza00esWczImZ8VKyBZ5ZVP/ztA7oQXyF7v4/0GEE=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:a7d0:: with SMTP id q199mr18989841vke.6.1633401015246; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 19:30:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <163323498843.11274.9452563933880073914@ietfa.amsl.com> <52AEFA9E-5F08-45BF-8825-F50F43C86AF5@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <52AEFA9E-5F08-45BF-8825-F50F43C86AF5@icann.org>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 19:30:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbmai=FgVxbuQc1mkNGTHeqMMwOZArT6S8m098neZA1tQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004a24af05cd91cf34"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/O8MOw5SqiFdo0Qb1fq6IAGhvz4E>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-iana-cons-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 02:30:22 -0000

On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 9:39 AM Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> wrote:

> > In Security Considerations, it says:
> >
> >   Security decisions about
> >   which algorithms are safe and not safe should be made by reading the
> >   security literature, not by looking in IANA registries.
> >
> > Should this document request addition of a note to this effect on the
> registry page itself?
>
> I don't think so, because it is true of every IANA registry page that
> lists crypto algorithms. Or, if you feel such a notice should be this
> registry, it should probably be in every similar registry, and that could
> be enacted by a separate Internet Draft that lists the myriad crypto
> algorthms.
>

I'm just trying to suggest a way to put this advice where it will be seen.
That is, it seems to me the people you're seeking to address -- those that
rely on IANA registries for implementation guidance, rather than documents
-- aren't going to read this document either, and will continue finding
that advice in registries and elsewhere.  Seems to me the way to reach them
is via a note in the registry.

Your call though.  If indeed this admonition would need to appear in many
places to be useful, I wouldn't expect this document to take care of all of
that.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email