[DNSOP] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-iana-cons-04: (with COMMENT)

Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sun, 03 October 2021 04:23 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 055753A0857; Sat, 2 Oct 2021 21:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-iana-cons@ietf.org, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org, tjw.ietf@gmail.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.38.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <163323498843.11274.9452563933880073914@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2021 21:23:09 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/mNGiFGKTokiIcHC3f2fHClZn_eE>
Subject: [DNSOP] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-iana-cons-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2021 04:23:09 -0000

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-iana-cons-04: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-iana-cons/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The Document Quality section of the shepherd writeup appears to be incomplete.

In Security Considerations, it says:

   Security decisions about
   which algorithms are safe and not safe should be made by reading the
   security literature, not by looking in IANA registries.

Should this document request addition of a note to this effect on the registry page itself?