Re: [DNSOP] Brian Haberman's No Record on draft-ietf-dnsop-root-loopback-04: (with COMMENT)
"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Wed, 30 September 2015 14:54 UTC
Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACBFB1B4155; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 07:54:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IkyLDYc2HiPq; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 07:54:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46FE41B5DC4; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 07:54:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.32.60.140] (142-254-17-123.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.17.123]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t8UEsgdr030578 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Sep 2015 07:54:42 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: Host 142-254-17-123.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.17.123] claimed to be [10.32.60.140]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 07:54:45 -0700
Message-ID: <0021A0B0-DEA4-4492-8484-E47819117472@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150930135306.9641.25056.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20150930135306.9641.25056.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.2r5141)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Owj7S5P5iXrqJx_xmtBweQu2SGw>
Cc: tjw.ietf@gmail.com, draft-ietf-dnsop-root-loopback@ietf.org, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, dnsop@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dnsop-root-loopback.ad@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dnsop-root-loopback.shepherd@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Brian Haberman's No Record on draft-ietf-dnsop-root-loopback-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 14:54:49 -0000
On 30 Sep 2015, at 6:53, Brian Haberman wrote: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I can't decide if I should ballot Yes because this document does a > good > job of describing how to deploy this approach or Abstain because the > fragility introduced in this approach appears to be untenable. > > In the meantime, can someone explain why this document is stating a > requirement to deploy this approach with IPv4 only? Yes. Given that this is running on loopback, it doesn't matter if the service is running on either the v4 or v6 loopback address. Unless a system running this service has absolutely no v4 at all (it doesn't even need to be offering v4 service to customers), the v4 loopback address is sufficient. There seems to be wide disagreement about what is the v6 loopback address: some of these addresses exist on some v6 systems but not others, or so we were told. If there is a v6 loopback address that is universally deployed (as 127/8 is for v4), we can add it, although it won't actually make this more deployable. --Paul Hoffman
- [DNSOP] Brian Haberman's No Record on draft-ietf-… Brian Haberman
- Re: [DNSOP] Brian Haberman's No Record on draft-i… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] Brian Haberman's No Record on draft-i… Brian Haberman
- Re: [DNSOP] Brian Haberman's No Record on draft-i… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] Brian Haberman's No Record on draft-i… Brian Haberman
- Re: [DNSOP] Brian Haberman's No Record on draft-i… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Brian Haberman's No Record on draft-i… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] Brian Haberman's No Record on draft-i… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Brian Haberman's No Record on draft-i… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] Brian Haberman's No Record on draft-i… Robert Edmonds
- Re: [DNSOP] Brian Haberman's No Record on draft-i… Evan Hunt
- Re: [DNSOP] Brian Haberman's No Record on draft-i… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Brian Haberman's No Record on draft-i… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Brian Haberman's No Record on draft-i… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Brian Haberman's No Record on draft-i… joel jaeggli
- Re: [DNSOP] Brian Haberman's No Record on draft-i… Evan Hunt
- Re: [DNSOP] Brian Haberman's No Record on draft-i… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Brian Haberman's No Record on draft-i… Darcy Kevin (FCA)
- Re: [DNSOP] Brian Haberman's No Record on draft-i… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Brian Haberman's No Record on draft-i… David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] Brian Haberman's No Record on draft-i… John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] Brian Haberman's No Record on draft-i… George Michaelson