[DNSOP] Brian Haberman's No Record on draft-ietf-dnsop-root-loopback-04: (with COMMENT)

["Brian Haberman" <[e-mail]>]

Brian Haberman has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-root-loopback-04: No Record

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-root-loopback/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I can't decide if I should ballot Yes because this document does a good
job of describing how to deploy this approach or Abstain because the
fragility introduced in this approach appears to be untenable.

In the meantime, can someone explain why this document is stating a
requirement to deploy this approach with IPv4 only?