Re: [DNSOP] Implementations of extended error?
Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Tue, 05 February 2019 18:59 UTC
Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F410130EB0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 10:59:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id klKEeAOdoCgR for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 10:59:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79323124BAA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 10:59:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 09164220BE; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 09:03:50 -0800 (PST)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Dick Franks <rwfranks@gmail.com>
Cc: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>, IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <ybl5zu3qurr.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <CAKW6Ri6fnejevDcaXkCnyQRpeRuQabb-qjahjzwmz5Y2hNBchQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 09:03:49 -0800
In-Reply-To: <CAKW6Ri6fnejevDcaXkCnyQRpeRuQabb-qjahjzwmz5Y2hNBchQ@mail.gmail.com> (Dick Franks's message of "Mon, 4 Feb 2019 12:06:34 +0000")
Message-ID: <ybllg2u1822.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/OyN5nTvWbJH1tFf6JX-yYEbZxXI>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Implementations of extended error?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 18:59:45 -0000
Dick Franks <rwfranks@gmail.com> writes: > There is not yet a proper IANA allocated option code for this. > > Might I suggest that all interested parties settle on 65015 from the > local/experimental block until the real thing arrives. That seems reasonable. -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI
- [DNSOP] Implementations of extended error? Wes Hardaker
- Re: [DNSOP] Implementations of extended error? Shane Kerr
- Re: [DNSOP] Implementations of extended error? Wes Hardaker
- Re: [DNSOP] Implementations of extended error? Anbang Wen
- Re: [DNSOP] Implementations of extended error? Shane Kerr
- Re: [DNSOP] Implementations of extended error? Shane Kerr
- Re: [DNSOP] Implementations of extended error? Dick Franks
- Re: [DNSOP] Implementations of extended error? Wes Hardaker
- Re: [DNSOP] Implementations of extended error? Wes Hardaker
- Re: [DNSOP] Implementations of extended error? Petr Špaček