IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Deprecating the status opcode

Baden Hughes <badenh@gmail.com> Wed, 15 May 2019 16:50 UTC

Return-Path: <badenh@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0CB12026C for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2019 09:50:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E0S53wCRKqKJ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2019 09:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72c.google.com (mail-qk1-x72c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68839120203 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2019 09:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72c.google.com with SMTP id c15so426624qkl.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2019 09:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=At37si6mM+0UO73HuvSyRynGeRURzq4reKQoWsp5Lis=; b=LnzOdbD+Jg5BqUnJsXilFlT5y9sZN0dIEhh0YMI3u/O2aOYVj+RiHENIRrMqNBWHxt M7EvkrhVGe26lqeS7FOyP30bYmdu9k9q6MpiEv51HVi3YsOy5GLpRbCPQbU4HxwRV9x+ wEKAQxIEzJHh2MgrQscGgWbdwlUR3kFrHF+pWOTIG+QFmhyc8dLERaFvHqa2bcLplLQF ka6RYNw+POCKlKK6CPc1XSFEe88y1+0zXb2TtoIAcXjLGswMcAc7LlJDETF2vm5wP3Ps tJn3/sCr8ouSc5b01w+Q239FnzlY3MWAzbPxf+rPjdCl36Rc36S/n2o5k3MxPYC/FcRh piZQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=At37si6mM+0UO73HuvSyRynGeRURzq4reKQoWsp5Lis=; b=AZ7tQ+GvCcRBLwgal5GfH/JEUA2WsaKP88TesFqrupXLxgvNb4deuzWRX4ZJKR5WDi U82gsxVvNtgXkiWV3peUR4ha5XNto3f2ZOmn3HONON50Dp6bVv4Ml82N3ZcLQrCKOiGn QVSZ8iFJLdNO9MYiRt0y0hC0dB92quGyg45n6Rdk4A6v0b5FEzWwIHvjULKHF6hpECAx b8pJXiwEYkao9hVSqZjaTHJdXIIyAhaxlzMrwkXOqFPRSEcjJI3JjorM7wBakfzhJ6zc 8a2kWtVQR/mBlUXblGjwiEwmmBvIa+u9ke6cY947xtSZS5GlZox6R89HasQwXxb5ecQe Dg+Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVuxYDXXHLwgoiLYgtu4IaxPxkRpbuiaoMM0LaPNhDlDzdLkhSS juhV9DzbBR0OTJRf4vJDBIMJK40nBltFo8qbyu4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxC87PFs2mf6tagFju2gLhfQYwVbmodqBO7YIdp/tKyc8j9dTDOIBmpIYFZFRJB7TKphjH3bb3oYgVCBeyNYA4=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:a44f:: with SMTP id n76mr3709419qke.148.1557939034555; Wed, 15 May 2019 09:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <064BA295-F3DD-46E4-86A9-E03CF68EB6BC@sinodun.com>
In-Reply-To: <064BA295-F3DD-46E4-86A9-E03CF68EB6BC@sinodun.com>
From: Baden Hughes <badenh@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 02:50:25 +1000
Message-ID: <CAPLp1PbnAuw7F0wP5z-rhytDeu-TZLv-xb24ZChTEuSMMrM2Dg@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Dickinson <jad@sinodun.com>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bc89880588eff205"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/P6D8WWI1ZknnAiqjbBGAiJi7di0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Deprecating the status opcode
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 16:50:38 -0000

Once again in the long tradition of IETF nitpicking, should the term
"deprecating" be used throughout, rather than "depreciating" ?

Baden

On Wed., 15 May 2019, 8:06 pm John Dickinson, <jad@sinodun.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In the spirit of deprecating things I have submitted a draft to deprecate
> the status opcode.
>
> A new version of I-D,
> draft-dickinson-dnsop-deprecating-status-opcode-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by John Dickinson and posted to the
> IETF repository.
>
> Name:           draft-dickinson-dnsop-deprecating-status-opcode
> Revision:       00
> Title:          Depreciating the DNS Status OpCode
> Document date:  2019-05-13
> Group:          Individual Submission
> Pages:          4
> URL:
> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dickinson-dnsop-deprecating-status-opcode-00.txt
> Status:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dickinson-dnsop-deprecating-status-opcode/
> Htmlized:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dickinson-dnsop-deprecating-status-opcode-00
> Htmlized:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dickinson-dnsop-deprecating-status-opcode
>
>
> Abstract:
>    This document updates RFC1035 to depreciate the Status DNS OpCode.
>
>
> John Dickinson
>
> https://sinodun.com
>
> Sinodun Internet Technologies Ltd.
> Magdalen Centre
> Oxford Science Park
> Robert Robinson Avenue
> Oxford OX4 4GA
> U.K.
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email