IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Deprecating the status opcode

tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 19 May 2019 17:31 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC81B1200B9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 May 2019 10:31:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3l-VrlsNCf-i for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 May 2019 10:31:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x734.google.com (mail-qk1-x734.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::734]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48EAC12004B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 May 2019 10:31:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x734.google.com with SMTP id d10so7496562qko.4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 May 2019 10:31:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=n5A3/UcuGJzDbvHwCODdXlEsD8ZaIsOav0ihHDpCI84=; b=klmBF1urJ1jld1hx6pU56XQdIhF/PZOO8NNlzsfyCUZ7ZV3vr04FXbeV1psdnLgKyx vkEN3mIWPIFxVmDrgqULsOOMBQFjp+C4MOFglQ17dgIGrCYZU10mtCNxNS4EVwinYsfS /ZCwHrpR3JxoJz66Y11EjFoqfjk2Yvdx2YdMlgDcyAaSB+E7SdHp1tvm6j7pqr7nJ1e/ lWQ1a2DGmhuvVl0++l8IO57IEy9y9e/buWGvzNEJ2+6WgF3nsArAvtiSGupLNZ2gSJcC lNmteOn2/5JrTCWf3wPHBXcPkCHeNeyMtX5IB+/ioAix70BfsoegsgQKgoR1v+OoY/Gs ZpVg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=n5A3/UcuGJzDbvHwCODdXlEsD8ZaIsOav0ihHDpCI84=; b=SEme+6qvG58VNnOwTH8SsH8IM5ti8QZ0mkOLBGqyQjFURuC6ds+RK4zAyxKFXhG2ME +Co2zdee3MU8+M2iyiWLK4nDle8jQI5qvl4vSnwmCRbx7kvpFj8c2HJ3XGB8/or2io70 wGxIrln7gc4bRcko0SXkaBbt3HQZtu3/FvTEk0JkWPN6Rf5T8WlybF3k5yoRpzy4m3L8 g3FA+mvANNbKKw4xJ0CXKIPEHydHfp2SMjq0qNQMraoWYtCzdOl/RZjo/1HpVCeeC6iz eXVstjNuuF6GUqX+NXzbbwM/WbYVvBRLdHsRi6NCXC9U8pbpEuIFAHtOeMHnoCnMa7EC y0sw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVsm0AX6dCIgIGdrBXMa9AT1FaTL4EOYlBbn2+FISPVb+qQhh4O v7ltVJ9hWbU0KiboZoPiolXnPwlm
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwZFn32LdReIwk4l160mV0thHKxbkR5flCohkpbn9FfIe6ciTlQ+br2E1sh/P7ThmtC6OVv6g==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:4c02:: with SMTP id z2mr43288013qka.1.1558287082287; Sun, 19 May 2019 10:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:380:1858:59bd:8c7a:78cf:c840:fc3a? ([2600:380:1858:59bd:8c7a:78cf:c840:fc3a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d16sm10089153qtd.73.2019.05.19.10.31.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 19 May 2019 10:31:21 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16F156)
In-Reply-To: <2f2f35be-963f-e217-950c-a11130489c5e@godaddy.com>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2019 13:31:20 -0400
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0098DB80-BB38-4F84-9F28-BC9EB1F96FDB@gmail.com>
References: <064BA295-F3DD-46E4-86A9-E03CF68EB6BC@sinodun.com> <20190515170020.3F76420141A62A@ary.qy> <CA+nkc8DTfhf7N9Wx0EaRC7kTWJcRMdv2v6P9Z+HH0DzvGbAuhw@mail.gmail.com> <7eca1d5a-bf88-b004-e260-be5eaeaffb05@nic.cz> <2f2f35be-963f-e217-950c-a11130489c5e@godaddy.com>
To: "Michael J. Sheldon" <msheldon@godaddy.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/RfAFIIj37l9_KkkNxsL20naVo8M>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Deprecating the status opcode
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 May 2019 17:31:26 -0000

Can we like this draft *and* a RFC cleanup of 1034/1035?

Though watching tcpm do this for 793 has been disheartening 

From my high tech gadget

> On May 16, 2019, at 11:46, Michael J. Sheldon <msheldon@godaddy.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/16/19 3:23 AM, Petr Špaček wrote:
>> Notice: This email is from an external sender.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 15. 05. 19 19:57, Bob Harold wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 1:00 PM John Levine <johnl@taugh.com
>>> <mailto:johnl@taugh.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>    In article <064BA295-F3DD-46E4-86A9-E03CF68EB6BC@sinodun.com
>>>    <mailto:064BA295-F3DD-46E4-86A9-E03CF68EB6BC@sinodun.com>> you write:
>>>> -=-=-=-=-=-
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> In the spirit of deprecating things I have submitted a draft to
>>>    deprecate the status opcode.
>>> 
>>>    RFC 1034 says it's "To be defined" so this seems a little premature.
>>> 
>>>    Other than that, go for it.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Does this increase or decrease the 'camel' page count?
>> 
>> Personally I think it is not worth the effort, it will just add one more
>> RFC to read and does not help the protocol maintenance.
>> 
>> I would say that it is better to have one "cleanup" RFC instead of
>> one-off doc with one useful paragraph in it. With one bigger document we
>> could say to newcommers "this is list of things you can ignore when you
>> encounter them in pile of DNS RFCs".
>> 
> 
> In a perfect world, we'd have occasional complete rewrites like what
> happened with RFCs 821, 2821, 5321 and RFCs 822, 2822, 5322
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Michael Sheldon
> Dev-DNS Services
> GoDaddy.com
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email