Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: RFC8499-bis
Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Wed, 11 November 2020 13:49 UTC
Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD0533A0D84 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 05:49:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E4uGAggcwySx for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 05:49:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1214D3A0D37 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 05:49:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:41958) by ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.137]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1kcqVT-000kah-MH (Exim 4.92.3) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:49:51 +0000
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:49:51 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: fujiwara@jprs.co.jp
cc: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20201111.134853.954368397002712101.fujiwara@jprs.co.jp>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011111343250.17264@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011101342180.32156@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <20201111.134853.954368397002712101.fujiwara@jprs.co.jp>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/PqH_WMhsP5zxRfjKD4gtmf6nw54>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: RFC8499-bis
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:49:59 -0000
fujiwara@jprs.co.jp <fujiwara@jprs.co.jp> wrote: > > We need four types of glue names. > Please propose new names. I thought this was supposed to be documenting existing terminology, not inventing new terminology. There are two kinds of glue: * glue required by the DNS, for in-bailiwick nameservers * sibling glue, sometimes required by registries "in-bailiwick" is a property of a nameserver, not glue Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ Shannon, Rockall: Variable 3 or 4 at first in Rockall, otherwise cyclonic becoming southwesterly later, 6 to gale 8, perhaps severe gale 9 later. Rough or very rough. Rain at times. Moderate or poor.
- [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: RFC8499-bis Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: RFC8499-bis Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: RFC8499-bis fujiwara
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: RFC8499-bis Tony Finch