Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07

Petr Špaček <petr.spacek@nic.cz> Mon, 26 March 2018 11:09 UTC

Return-Path: <petr.spacek@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96594126C22 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 04:09:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fkuHjoI_SN0H for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 04:09:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [IPv6:2001:1488:800:400::400]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3431120713 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 04:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:1488:fffe:6:37:44ff:fe34:d861] (unknown [IPv6:2001:1488:fffe:6:37:44ff:fe34:d861]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B6DE962670 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 13:09:44 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1522062584; bh=HwnS+dSzJDuQi5yvGx4XolneoZ5fUuNHCr4OmxNUyJk=; h=To:From:Date; b=mbRpxIBPjA90UQkEz4YnUbNTpJvHDAQV0iPIws9zplbLe2+JQjBLLypD+0uiflg2E XabhA+bjWofWqqDPxFDYPN1RRilZhE6IOPxZ8wXEkijXxCpWz/drJtyc0mi/B6+KvN jLdcyz3G+8oVjX+pbxCN05YW1CdbZujkptrgz+eA=
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <83786E94-ABCA-43F9-A038-F8F61C93E797@isc.org> <783C0A50-0DC5-4BC6-A105-F19D2BEF98E4@apnic.net> <C771B8F7-E9D4-4CAC-9277-EAE3AC74CC62@isc.org> <CAHw9_iJM4nZyoytk7xgY_OzU9c7BCEpO4O+Jex9g6A58XYREGw@mail.gmail.com> <CE78422D-529C-46BF-A007-CF042699DBFE@isc.org>
From: Petr Špaček <petr.spacek@nic.cz>
Organization: CZ.NIC
Message-ID: <7841959e-916b-bfdb-9370-e9d236646f8a@nic.cz>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 13:09:44 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CE78422D-529C-46BF-A007-CF042699DBFE@isc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Q-BNeik0GGtBb6HJFYl6cDLkvoo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 11:09:49 -0000

On 23.3.2018 13:08, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Warren,
> 
>> however, we have
>> already changed the name multiple times and implementers are
>> (understandably) becoming annoyed, and supporting N different labels
>> for the tester is also annoying [0].
> 
> Who are exactly these people?
> 
> We are aware only of Knot Resolver implementation so far. And I guess Geoff has a “client” side implementation, but it’s not like everybody already implemented this and we are the last one that are asking for a change.

I'm fine with change, even though tests need to be re-signed which is
always PITA.

Petr Špaček  @  CZ.NIC