Re: [DNSOP] Stockholm meeting slot assignment CHANGED

John Schnizlein <schnizlein@isoc.org> Tue, 21 July 2009 18:37 UTC

Return-Path: <schnizlein@isoc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EDA13A6ABC for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_MLH_Stock1=0.87, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q4LITUzjtGiE for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp125.iad.emailsrvr.com (smtp125.iad.emailsrvr.com [207.97.245.125]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD643A6978 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay32.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay32.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 473CB1B403D; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:37:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by relay32.relay.iad.mlsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: schnizlein-AT-isoc.org) with ESMTPSA id 20F291B4061; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:37:10 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <2E16639C-D479-40E2-BCC1-7F48C5CA125B@isoc.org>
From: John Schnizlein <schnizlein@isoc.org>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090721183248.GE2837@shinkuro.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-71--688709898"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:37:09 -0400
References: <20090707185515.GF32598@unknown.office.denic.de> <200907080212.n682C9Yx029792@drugs.dv.isc.org> <4A544C22.1080200@nlnetlabs.nl> <20090709001145.GC15589@x27.adm.denic.de> <20090721183248.GE2837@shinkuro.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Stockholm meeting slot assignment CHANGED
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:37:11 -0000

Thanks for explaining that.

Now, what about this other draft that seems to call for recursive  
resolvers to know about address translation?
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-vogt-durand-virtual-ip6-connectivity-01.txt

John

On 2009Jul21, at 2:32 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 02:11:45AM +0200, Peter Koch wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 09:34:58AM +0200, Matthijs Mekking wrote:
>>
>>> According to the behave ML, they are planning to cover that DNS  
>>> topic
>>> indeed on the monday:
>>
>> thanks for pointing this out, it's indeed an important overlap.   
>> We're
>> coordinating with the behave chairs to get this resolved, which might
>> result in another re-scheduling. Please stay tuned ...
>
> FWIW, I think this has been sorted out; DNS64 has been moved to the
> first item in the Tuesday BEHAVE session.
>
> A
>
> -- 
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs@shinkuro.com
> Shinkuro, Inc.
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop