Re: [DNSOP] Stockholm meeting slot assignment CHANGED

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com> Tue, 21 July 2009 19:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@shinkuro.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0DBB28C346 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.173
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.173 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.574, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, SARE_MLH_Stock1=0.87]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63Nkb6o4tHfe for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (mail.yitter.info [208.86.224.201]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4846328C34F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from crankycanuck.ca (76-10-166-247.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.166.247]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 043232FE8ED5 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:12:47 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:12:46 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20090721191245.GG2837@shinkuro.com>
References: <20090707185515.GF32598@unknown.office.denic.de> <200907080212.n682C9Yx029792@drugs.dv.isc.org> <4A544C22.1080200@nlnetlabs.nl> <20090709001145.GC15589@x27.adm.denic.de> <20090721183248.GE2837@shinkuro.com> <2E16639C-D479-40E2-BCC1-7F48C5CA125B@isoc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2E16639C-D479-40E2-BCC1-7F48C5CA125B@isoc.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Stockholm meeting slot assignment CHANGED
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:12:49 -0000

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 02:37:09PM -0400, John Schnizlein wrote:

> Now, what about this other draft that seems to call for recursive  
> resolvers to know about address translation?
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-vogt-durand-virtual-ip6-connectivity-01.txt

Clearly, it needs review ;-) Note that it's not a BEHAVE WG item yet.
Unfortunately, its time slot conflicts with the DNSOP meeting.

Remember, anyway, work is supposed to be undertaken on the mailing
lists, so if we have an issue with a draft in some WG, we likely ought
to be taking our concerns to that WG's list and raising them.

A


-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@shinkuro.com
Shinkuro, Inc.