Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any and DO=0
bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl> Mon, 08 February 2016 21:55 UTC
Return-Path: <bert.hubert@powerdns.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD371B33C7 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 13:55:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.415
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.415 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FAKE_REPLY_C=1.486, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8LuibzevHw6G for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 13:55:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tmpmail.powerdns.com (tmpmail.powerdns.com [128.199.32.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C266A1B33C0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 13:55:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tmpmail.powerdns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE1463B98 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:55:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tmpmail.powerdns.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tmpmail.powerdns.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q9wqA-W8uW4U for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:55:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from server.ds9a.nl (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f15:bba:d250:99ff:fe82:6c4a]) by tmpmail.powerdns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED21F60021 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:55:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: by server.ds9a.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D98A8AC0AC4; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 22:55:44 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 22:55:44 +0100
From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20160208215544.GA29032@server.ds9a.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/T3Zu7U04of3YL5hGrR2QvXf1RPY>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any and DO=0
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 21:55:47 -0000
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:37:09AM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote: > Or just having the TCP implementation in BIND get improved as it’s clear there > are some more people pushing in this direction. I’m looking at just putting > something like DNSDIST on my hosts to process TCP and balance it across > multiple daemons to do the query scale. With a liiiitle work btw dnsdist could proxy TCP/IP questions over UDP with gigantic packet sizes. This would get you TCP/IP to the unwashed BCP38-free masses but UDP in your home network. Might that be a good idea? Bert
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any and DO=0 bert hubert
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any and DO=0 Shane Kerr