IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any and DO=0

bert hubert <bert.hubert@powerdns.com> Mon, 08 February 2016 21:38 UTC

Return-Path: <bert.hubert@powerdns.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77851B33A0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 13:38:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CCMTJ5ZBHrOw for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 13:38:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tmpmail.powerdns.com (tmpmail.powerdns.com [128.199.32.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88991B2E50 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 13:38:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tmpmail.powerdns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B42263B98; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:38:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tmpmail.powerdns.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tmpmail.powerdns.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wBCW-HbL9PPz; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:38:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from server.ds9a.nl (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f15:bba:d250:99ff:fe82:6c4a]) by tmpmail.powerdns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F423460021; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:38:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: by server.ds9a.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D81F7AC0AC4; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 22:38:13 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 22:38:13 +0100
From: bert hubert <bert.hubert@powerdns.com>
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <20160208213813.GA25134@server.ds9a.nl>
References: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1602052158390.7000@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1602071411270.2469@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <20160207200449.GA74042@isc.org> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1602081502360.11434@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <8126C49E-5AB3-45CA-B441-DB2809F6DD2E@puck.nether.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <8126C49E-5AB3-45CA-B441-DB2809F6DD2E@puck.nether.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/euz1UlqoWr6_Ete0PDMu1Siq7YM>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 06:06:03 -0800
Cc: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>, Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>, dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any and DO=0
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 21:40:46 -0000

On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:37:09AM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
> Or just having the TCP implementation in BIND get improved as it’s clear there
> are some more people pushing in this direction.  I’m looking at just putting
> something like DNSDIST on my hosts to process TCP and balance it across
> multiple daemons to do the query scale.

With a liiiitle work btw dnsdist could proxy TCP/IP questions over UDP with
gigantic packet sizes. This would get you TCP/IP to the unwashed BCP38-free
masses but UDP in your home network.

Might that be a good idea?

	Bert

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email