IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-19

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Wed, 14 December 2022 18:27 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D9AFC14CE47 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 10:27:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=virtualized-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JJk_37jRtUPf for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 10:27:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52a.google.com (mail-pg1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B0EEC14CE46 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 10:27:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id s196so2563751pgs.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 10:27:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=virtualized-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:cc:date:in-reply-to:from:subject :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=sgdaXQoOEOR6LTIJG/QgEkWNsIXl5M/R1Ctg+foWNVs=; b=b7ZK8WCWPYbV5/g+4Mc9js2rB8FnLwq/TW9JT4zdZA+3fKkTNtCCoB2TjnXjDOxeME QNd2/QEI3SjvaRHLmWHOGO6vT/YWRENrmnZHUd6bwvOGlEWGVLXGgMbVRwuVWL04JvKE s2QaV69WJghSPbeYgmKmXe2cEj8UMWByx4PchF2jjalt5O7qvpQs3ZlOKD6KEMDPilkb GsdTgnPy3o52DQkp1a3GGmPg98PUsXLsZHlUdiOLn6mBR8inJS80X8fzp6ahnI3gC9Ma WSGEx3J2R0fALvL7yAhug/5zO/AZ/Dc3uLdHxYjzUC+K9H6a31AHsL/GerOUM0Z+X58D +gmA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:cc:date:in-reply-to:from:subject :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=sgdaXQoOEOR6LTIJG/QgEkWNsIXl5M/R1Ctg+foWNVs=; b=DgFyRijBzYUgx5/EnRBT5CClpm/IapGfcA7hrFBFqE25nFGjqSPgNQ3E/vB7DlgzJ8 gGNzyjs/QJCrq8EJqBZKzEKbEPPEmllivi2gzf5j09q8lchF4pLJOTPtVWQnNweQsoa4 IvTiqpkpUmGuNQvGIVaXX5a7oi8dJTmzAusApLVKxAtcetbd9F0PZjWXuXXDwIyV1hM4 VJw2SLeUuwo0XjMHfzICBb8ftisBv0fChw3gHtqtKQ5Q87vrZsZznF2aBB7EhLOa7Skp tkbs+RiJS5quRLJ3dvx+fSESalsFr6GSs+c0r9phSsY1i7BzBWaXLzwPIHSc8KIG0j9L itEg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmLZg8RTBVPpBVgWDXmW9Utbi+rL102SAgCEKQBi0sX3PhHfMmS /sLpGuvpWm0AYqwqD0uPY3W8XhdQjxuV2RMF
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4FwtcpvM309QUazGZ2oafiNw5Pj2pAoItUg2hwqIe33r5yWi/QRvMIBdRUCyVlaac8BSVOvg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:791:b0:577:f836:6bcb with SMTP id g17-20020a056a00079100b00577f8366bcbmr23743855pfu.29.1671042470171; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 10:27:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (2603-8001-9701-bebd-54f2-de7f-6c05-0603.res6.spectrum.com. [2603:8001:9701:bebd:54f2:de7f:6c05:603]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a197-20020a621ace000000b00575fbe1cf2esm187083pfa.109.2022.12.14.10.27.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Dec 2022 10:27:49 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1BFFD5E5-DFFD-4308-AD0A-3483CB02CA89"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.300.101.1.3\))
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <595B77CC-433F-47FC-A604-ABA8FE1E8E43@rfc1035.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 10:27:37 -0800
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <44ACB8E8-D4C5-40DB-972C-7AD0B1B8E099@virtualized.org>
References: <20221214103710.zm6t5oshhnfwsm4g@werkbank> <9C02A5E7-3EA5-40EB-B265-4989D9961B6E@nohats.ca> <221b69b9-adea-d13a-2976-25bc9464621f@lear.ch> <595B77CC-433F-47FC-A604-ABA8FE1E8E43@rfc1035.com>
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.300.101.1.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/U5592-UKsHuyPthOyp2jheVB9T4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-19
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 18:27:56 -0000

Hi,

On Dec 14, 2022, at 9:33 AM, Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> wrote:
> If these principles apply, why is the IETF bothering with .alt at all?

My impression has been the primary intent is to ensure .ALT is not allocated for DNS use and secondarily, to try to curtail future discussions of this topic.

FWIW, if my impression is accurate, I’m confident the former will be successful (I’m sure the next round of gTLDs will disallow any strings the IETF comes up with, among others) but am less confident about the latter.

Regards,
-drc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email