[DNSOP] new version of draft-wallstrom-dnsop-dns-delegation-requirements

Patrik Wallström <pawal@blipp.com> Thu, 27 October 2016 20:58 UTC

Return-Path: <pawal@blipp.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B496812941A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:58:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.631
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.631 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8sTonLxKzi-u for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vic20.blipp.com (vic20.blipp.com [192.195.142.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF8FF1296EF for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <58126A66.8020100@blipp.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 22:58:14 +0200
From: Patrik Wallström <pawal@blipp.com>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.4 (Windows/20161007)
To: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/VlRn5aGUircQ7DUNnpc0DCkobMk>
Subject: [DNSOP] new version of draft-wallstrom-dnsop-dns-delegation-requirements
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 20:58:25 -0000

Hi,

I just wanted to tell you that we have published a new version of the 
I-D draft-wallstrom-dnsop-dns-delegation-requirements. It fixes all the 
comments that we have received so far, both on the mailing list and 
during the meeting where it was last discussed:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wallstrom-dnsop-dns-delegation-requirements

One thing that have bugged me was a comment to separate the meanings of 
domain names and host names. Host names follow a much more strict set of 
rules (they are all referenced in RFC 7719 under "host names") than 
domain names that could pretty much contain anything that fit into the 
DNS protocol. Right now we reference section 2.1 of RFC1123, but 7719 
refers to 3.1 of 1034. Not that much of a difference, but at least worth 
mentioning.

In the document we try to follow the rules that if there is something 
that is required from the DNS protocol perspective, it's a MUST. If 
there is anything needed to have a properly configured DNS that is more 
of a recommendation, it is a SHOULD.

Please have a look.

Thanks,
Patrik