Re: [DNSOP] DNSOPWorking Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec3-guidance

[Wes Hardaker <[e-mail]>]

Tim Wicinski <[e-mail]> writes:

> With the authors feeling there are no outstanding changes and most people are happy with the current
> version.  So this means it's time:

Note that two small changes have been introduced since -06 were
published, which were just wording related changes.  Here are the diffs:


<    zone owners about good values to select.  Recent in academic studies
<    have shown that NSEC3 hashing provides only provides moderate
<    protection [GPUNSEC3][ZONEENUM].
---
>    zone owners about good values to select.  Recent academic studies
>    have shown that NSEC3 hashing provides only moderate protection
>    [GPUNSEC3][ZONEENUM].

and


<    iteration counts greater than 0, which will likely resulting in
<    returning a SERVFAIL to the client when no processed responses are
---
>    iteration counts greater than 0, which will likely result in
>    returning a SERVFAIL to the client when no acceptable responses are

-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI