IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] adoption mechanics and disclaimers wrt dns-rpz

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Mon, 20 March 2017 18:51 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3C112950E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 11:51:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5baC4sTpkAhC for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 11:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22d.google.com (mail-pg0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E93D128B37 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 11:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id t143so15781385pgb.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 11:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to; bh=DPUTIH888JqmSA3UtnOLpag36HydhA6iU4cnW+MPcck=; b=kOQJc6xwADALzVmKdFRMixms2EJIZ02ZFA4Q1snt6z5ja8BHo6EaAzJYYYEuGuPQgz iThOW5RGl+MRO8krIQpTCN6J9MjgpCwGIvuXwSpdo7EMo6R2hIeDHonoXQJQ9nWU5vC4 ZLfsVkld7jqUz+OWctOs4ZGSyH8Ss4kpXOOaUixCUjHkReaWmi0plRsEk/bE599Oj94Y ibmPEawiCihQ9yQy73/Cmlwh5FJQuoJJZwaQfBugtErZ9CHK0rmjArLKn7Uh0PNkYYBJ rA6UVnzMPkp4ZmC+LnCGe9XUvgUb+cohkvfxRb11CoxIacrPMpSF4+aZfR0kjsoQMc43 yTRw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=DPUTIH888JqmSA3UtnOLpag36HydhA6iU4cnW+MPcck=; b=AYJRdIeOZC9Dr9iUHJHX/g/I5fpm1DedQNtUIDmkB4BuBYZqXU+tmEA6B4m3kWW/N2 2Xo8yZDvqJFovNCqdwjC7qd7VQ4k8quV0JwxKLiNs57zyyNhU2+NyqmF0Wbc+gAUKmFg 38CXhd7kJAcT8eSImLJE0vdJzWMi98BUAPgkC6e/HVB1eaMXsQ1tyuX97ppLqwtD2lbo LMh+aWcpBAzVDmUNGMRnQCPYw3ux/00G8KZRewu9G8CVww+QGpqHAoQzxZOZxdmlfos8 8M9Em7qZ/JLaGx3fpVyiZl3F/DqSi8ey7eGZeLSCRq4kNQO9yJcqKeV4bF9HOLxFKqsZ Sssw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2WyWh4TACrlVH8GVi5QYFB1bwyXMnm12al7w8kE1MUw6fM1MdeJlURnxacihMthA==
X-Received: by 10.84.231.206 with SMTP id g14mr13888712pln.13.1490035881166; Mon, 20 Mar 2017 11:51:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Melindas-MacBook-Pro.local (69-161-17-170-radius.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [69.161.17.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s65sm34828995pgb.64.2017.03.20.11.51.20 for <dnsop@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Mar 2017 11:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <2232822.T0nP9Ksjf9@linux-hs2j> <CAHw9_i+q1BH25RLA=kZg7NB7re1GvAWVrOehzCDQi+U_USvovw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e8afade4-5c39-d47a-0fa6-ae5d13b431ff@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 10:51:18 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_i+q1BH25RLA=kZg7NB7re1GvAWVrOehzCDQi+U_USvovw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WseUHuAq6DCGSn3GA00RXKFJkGTHAhHjO"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Wi1iRmgDg5skC9GjXlq2BsgIynA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] adoption mechanics and disclaimers wrt dns-rpz
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 18:51:24 -0000

On 3/20/17 7:15 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> It appears that this may have been a process violation here - RFC5378
> Section 3.3. Right to Produce Derivative Works seems to say that the
> IETF needs change control before a WG can formally adopt a document. I
> believe that we missed the fact that this included "non-standard"
> copyright boilerplate.
> 
> I / we are still investigating, and would appreciate it if the WG
> gives us some time to figure this out.

I was (and am) quite astonished that the working group would adopt
this as a working group deliverable under the circumstances.

Melinda

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email