IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] draft-dickinson-dnsop-5966-bis

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Mon, 27 October 2014 14:01 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A1A31A872B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 07:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JiAwir3otstb for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 07:01:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com [209.85.212.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 008E81ACCF8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 07:00:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id q5so6454756wiv.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 07:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=n4cb6hRxQIZDCwCwsDTDQ3G4gn2JBJUXlOd5eyqGgK8=; b=ZCoMGgpN0EeJ4WNdhDs7z1cg8iALdcI8j+guUrWPs+qzX0RKksl+LJSMuTtmKjTrsL wBWudMUMpYtjag0JkNuG8ePoj0/egJOQoV9IFSqktYEOjZoy1FRsMfCZ4OYPvGsrnuuS yNeqb+8sdUUbM6D8taWLIvdmaykyKxYhDgExD0FlcN5PYLavJE9L40EiHqMK0KGWqh6V cEBQZ+icQzYUh+D1Bl9atdzlK5nQ5kMQ0cRtVmTck31k2R8cFs44mE+/iVE9fHlHSdu+ vEt+IHfDs4BP0miv1KpfgltRKlEycBlXJkGKGHKAR5+kwlVF9B5AWNwPWVTj0DG4ju8p /MGQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnj5XiNMpNmA/1ggcNBre4/DtL37JEB4qKiXpOityeMaGvahZU8lakUGyIPbRxInRWz4ZOi
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.62.238 with SMTP id b14mr22095263wjs.46.1414418442056; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 07:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.77.134 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 07:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D37D516A-D51E-45C3-94C2-D0C1BD83DB64@vpnc.org>
References: <D37D516A-D51E-45C3-94C2-D0C1BD83DB64@vpnc.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 10:00:42 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iLx_khb1JCWbq9NWCp6BTZVTPTwrpc83cx2taUFisJEbg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/XpoIiVu_0esJRsxqwaX7pkQuiPY
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-dickinson-dnsop-5966-bis
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:01:08 -0000

On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:
> I strongly support the adoption of this document by the WG and will review it during its process.

I didn't see the CfA email, so randomly replying here.

Yes, this looks useful. Support adoption and will review.
W

>
> --Paul Hoffman
>
> Abstract:
>   This document updates the requirements for the support of TCP as a
>   transport protocol for DNS implementations.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dickinson-dnsop-5966-bis/
>
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dickinson-dnsop-5966-bis-00
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email