Re: [DNSOP] draft-dickinson-dnsop-5966-bis

Warren,

There wasn't one, yet, since we've been trying to make sure there's actual interest in a document before asking for the formal commitment to it.

But as you probably saw it's on the agenda in HI and we'll be looking for interest/reviewers/etc. then.

The interest already expressed is noted, your offers to do work will not be forgotten :-)

thanks,
Suzanne

On Oct 27, 2014, at 10:00 AM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:
>> I strongly support the adoption of this document by the WG and will review it during its process.
> 
> I didn't see the CfA email, so randomly replying here.
> 
> Yes, this looks useful. Support adoption and will review.
> W
> 
>> 
>> --Paul Hoffman
>> 
>> Abstract:
>>  This document updates the requirements for the support of TCP as a
>>  transport protocol for DNS implementations.
>> 
>> 
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dickinson-dnsop-5966-bis/
>> 
>> There's also a htmlized version available at:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dickinson-dnsop-5966-bis-00
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> DNSOP mailing list
>> DNSOP@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
> idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
> of pants.
>   ---maf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop