IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-chain-query

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Mon, 09 November 2015 13:02 UTC

Return-Path: <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 021331B2A77 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 05:02:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GGsQvjS00yYZ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 05:02:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CF461B2A73 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 05:02:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.54]:42405) by ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.157]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:fanf2) id 1Zvm5w-0001YI-RI (Exim 4.86_36-e07b163) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Mon, 09 Nov 2015 13:02:48 +0000
Received: from fanf2 by hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local id 1Zvm5w-0004Pm-EI (Exim 4.72) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Mon, 09 Nov 2015 13:02:48 +0000
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 13:02:48 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-X-Sender: fanf2@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk
To: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5635CF1A.4030803@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1511091301260.25050@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <5635CF1A.4030803@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LSU 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: Tony Finch <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/YAOKdXMZe4iMt2HV0CT-cAtjVKQ>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-chain-query
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 13:02:52 -0000

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The authors have updated their document to address all outstanding
> issues, and we feel the document is ready for Working Group Last Call.

The rationale for this document is still completely wrong. It does not
provide any reduction in latency compared to the existing DNS protocol.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Biscay, Southeast Fitzroy: Southwesterly 5 or 6 in far north, otherwise
variable 3 or 4. Moderate or rough. Fair. Good.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email