Re: [DNSOP] A short note on the DNSOP agenda....

Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com> Thu, 19 March 2015 12:11 UTC

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150319082207.GA11609@nic.fr>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 08:11:19 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5988C2F1-9DCB-4F31-8A00-95F2D6A4D899@gmail.com>
References: <55034644.6040204@gmail.com> <20150319082207.GA11609@nic.fr>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/YjYsoy6qjwmVyoyonOFV4L_0sXg>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] A short note on the DNSOP agenda....
Precedence: list

Hi Stephane,

On Mar 19, 2015, at 4:22 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote:

> 
> May be all discussions about RFC 6761 and its followups could be moved
> to a special session (because of the huge potential for lengthy
> discussions)?

We already suggested this. We'll consider you as supportive, thank you.

On a more general note, part of the agenda traffic jam is that we've been insufficiently willing to tell people that getting in a document at the draft deadline is not necessarily enough to get an agenda slot. Please expect more pushback on late requests in the future.

We're also considering asking for two slots next time, as v6ops and a few other groups often do (and as we did with the cluster of privacy-oriented documents in London that led to DPRIVE), but consider that something of a last resort.

We continue to remind people to do the reviews they committed to so we can keep moving documents forward.

best,
Suzanne

Re: [DNSOP] A short note on the DNSOP agenda.... Stephane Bortzmeyer
Re: [DNSOP] A short note on the DNSOP agenda.... Suzanne Woolf
Re: [DNSOP] A short note on the DNSOP agenda.... Mark Andrews
[DNSOP] A short note on the DNSOP agenda.... Tim Wicinski