IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] draft-lewis-domain-names-00.txt

George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> Fri, 18 September 2015 16:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ggm@algebras.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEDAC1A702E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WRvfatqiWaGg for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-f177.google.com (mail-qk0-f177.google.com [209.85.220.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 258EC1A7D85 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qkcf65 with SMTP id f65so21871392qkc.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=nbYCyh5tsybWOIIN5lLwGpg2+kavQhytsZhI6FN4sDg=; b=bGuDChwqNtmitbOHdDCet39v4CngarQvK0DtPBJtIV28JXMqVZkOfIhvn7klRGwKJY KA2kRTPWtwY2W2cBgRbsMzE8Unel9iXFYriujj5aEgMa0bURL/ghOqNbwu42Hj1Ripjq h0Vr5bH7jJslJKuGTdzKGBQz848HbhmBPnucQXJRYPKNY9cY0Xz6KJqB3RG3zU7/W6Xe cYbqyUvurfRKSiNuRR2pFQUJZltKcL7r2Bv72xRYLh5FGJkEH3EjaGfZDAm+9e7v90lC 1JC+hX/1NUP3fN8nGC8rId3reOhHKWtc50Zw0ZsKFh0vk1f86iouRe2evr7amckE3oy2 NUbQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmy8tyMXWeUhCyKMEYll7yW/01BXPOOSBY1pvhqAiVFM06Scatne/D6/+eYNfk5BLCib3Bc
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.55.25.220 with SMTP id 89mr7549126qkz.40.1442595509252; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.55.221.79 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [2001:13c7:7001:2128:a4b6:59f6:e659:5bc4]
In-Reply-To: <FAF424AD-E95C-4D0B-9C9E-CCCD95B44181@rfc1035.com>
References: <D2209363.F235%edward.lewis@icann.org> <CAKr6gn1aM0=Mi3343aaXKc=WtqGnJqoQm64+r4LDKzT0MyAF7A@mail.gmail.com> <14957733-EB45-45ED-9B5C-55B0943CDACD@fb.com> <45A1C205-3DF1-40A3-9282-CA8344805CBE@hopcount.ca> <FAF424AD-E95C-4D0B-9C9E-CCCD95B44181@rfc1035.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:58:29 -0300
Message-ID: <CAKr6gn3T9Cp6LRXJRaSxmRBYGYkcRQF5c9yi_poyMwU7eKASOg@mail.gmail.com>
From: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114739b8e24da2052008705d"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/YvD6_NEc0aF24H9gOszY9FTG9l0>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-lewis-domain-names-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 16:58:32 -0000

Ed wrote a draft whose purpose claimed to be definitional around what
domain names are. In that context I replied. If you don't really care how
we use words, thats fine too.

I agree it won't alter anything and I want to stop here, since I suspect
I'm already well on the way to hitting peoples kill file.

G

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> wrote:

>
> On 18 Sep 2015, at 17:19, Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> wrote:
>
> > Whether or not we should call an onion or mdns name a "domain name" or
> something else is just a detail. I don't think agreeing on the answer is
> going to solve any of the problems that we actually have
>
> +1
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email