IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-qdcount-is-one

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Tue, 26 March 2024 11:48 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C0FC1CAF35 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 04:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uMceRx6DEtik for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 04:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (shaun.rfc1035.com [93.186.33.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1B37C1CAF2A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 04:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (125-63-15-22.ip4.superloop.au [125.63.15.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C3092420E4A; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 11:48:03 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <6552154F-E1A3-405E-A6AF-69CBF6F98B93@strandkip.nl>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 11:47:51 +0000
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B9A68FDA-A679-433E-817E-DAB4F333DBF2@rfc1035.com>
References: <CACJ6M166X6jk1yhBgq1SJL_SPkifKXCSr7cy9T_HNykkztk77A@mail.gmail.com> <26ED9952-9635-443F-A0E2-3058EBA429A3@strandkip.nl> <4400b12b-7b5e-4823-80a3-4c653636cded@isc.org> <6552154F-E1A3-405E-A6AF-69CBF6F98B93@strandkip.nl>
To: jabley@strandkip.nl
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ZKW5WO8YE8isDFKVfY6c8pDv-_M>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-qdcount-is-one
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 11:48:15 -0000


> On 26 Mar 2024, at 11:23, jabley@strandkip.nl wrote:
> 
> However, I think the title is objectively accurate, even if you do not like it.

+1. And when the info to implement an RFC can be accurately summarised in its title, it seems a shame not to do that.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email