Re: [DNSOP] search for normative reference
Tim Wicinski <tim.wicinski@teamaol.com> Wed, 18 December 2013 07:15 UTC
Return-Path: <tim.wicinski@teamaol.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D70A01AE0DB for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 23:15:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_74=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id flrKmD8qO1NY for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 23:15:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omr-d10.mx.aol.com (omr-d10.mx.aol.com [205.188.108.134]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 234171AE0E9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Dec 2013 23:15:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from AOLDTCMEI31.ad.aol.aoltw.net (aoldtcmei31.office.aol.com [10.180.121.109]) by omr-d10.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id C23B47003F60F; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 02:15:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [10.172.0.178] (172.17.8.193) by AOLDTCMEI31.ad.aol.aoltw.net (10.180.121.109) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 02:15:28 -0500
Message-ID: <52B14B8F.6060200@teamaol.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 02:15:27 -0500
From: Tim Wicinski <tim.wicinski@teamaol.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:26.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/26.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andreas Schulze <sca@andreasschulze.de>, dnsop@ietf.org
References: <20131218081224.Horde.vc5ABSJLAukUw7zWbybLIA3@horde.andreasschulze.de>
In-Reply-To: <20131218081224.Horde.vc5ABSJLAukUw7zWbybLIA3@horde.andreasschulze.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [172.17.8.193]
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] search for normative reference
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 07:15:31 -0000
On 12/18/13 2:12 AM, Andreas Schulze wrote: > > Hello, > > I was requested to delegate a new subzone to nameservers with private > ip addresses. > I know it's at least not what makes me happy. But are there IETF > recommendations against this? > That would help me to drop the request. > I suspect it is something along the lines of kittens.pony internally? I inherited such a situation and the 'logic' given to me was that they could not be recursed externally, adding to the 'security by obscurity' counters. tim
- [DNSOP] search for normative reference Andreas Schulze
- Re: [DNSOP] search for normative reference Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] search for normative reference Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] search for normative reference Chris Thompson
- Re: [DNSOP] search for normative reference Andreas Schulze