Re: [DNSOP] HTTPS and SVBC key names.

We landed on 63 in the draft version we just published  (to align with max
label lengths).
There's no reason they *need* to be short as they are just in presentation
form, so their length
comes down to usability and finding the right words.  The longest currently
is 15 and it would
be better to avoid future ones needing to be artificially constrained.  Is
there a reason we'd
want to decrease this (eg, to 31)?

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 1:07 PM Ólafur Guðmundsson <olafur@cloudflare.com>
wrote:

> How about 2 or 10 ?
> why do  the names to need to be long ?
>
> Olafur
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 10:18 PM Erik Nygren <erik+ietf@nygren.org> wrote:
>
>> Or 64?
>>
>>
>>
>> - Erik
>>
>>      [Sent from my IPv6 connected T-Mobile 4G LTE mobile device]
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020, 9:40 PM Ben Schwartz <bemasc=
>> 40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>>> How about 255 characters?
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 9:25 PM Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Can we please have a length limit on key names?  At the moment they
>>>> could be a billion characters long as they don’t go over the wire.
>>>> --
>>>> Mark Andrews, ISC
>>>> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
>>>> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 <+61%202%209871%204742>              INTERNET:
>>>> marka@isc.org
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> DNSOP mailing list
>>>> DNSOP@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> DNSOP mailing list
>>> DNSOP@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DNSOP mailing list
>> DNSOP@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>>
>
>
> --
> Ólafur Gudmundsson | Engineering Director
> www.cloudflare.com blog.cloudflare.com
>