IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] HTTPS and SVBC key names.

Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> Thu, 16 July 2020 12:32 UTC

Return-Path: <bemasc@google.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6056C3A0A65 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 05:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N8WqbeQojPeR for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 05:31:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb33.google.com (mail-yb1-xb33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F38D83A0A1F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 05:31:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb33.google.com with SMTP id y13so2752516ybj.10 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 05:31:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XZ2s7Wvon5osvn9eC0rWhczs9ZH/uPRsCoc/MEyf3UQ=; b=Koc7iKGjmeZfVDp45Ku9iVGNqrhISKxqaVUG56p1ArTNjvXNzdMluEeVvUTTDOx2Xd DD3lUFSC/Q6YqxuzTZmLfKP9Nap6Rf8Wu+PaerDB5o2XrilMbyWOcztKuzHOmIk1BKA4 ph8SMrZ+bamk2pu9oKczknVlezeN2OduYjud2PH4XhX2E+QavZR2weBnYEogY/m3A+/4 o38N3aTWpmTjgMArBpEoaBFno/aaN45sdg8ikdsoU2M0Xn6iizYeDoDXBvnR3mgjh4qm Ofws0Pk8oKbU98gO1aUvXCB3DBC0ee3pZTY/3DgoOQUqpyNsr35HWl68sam41va8fNbI UGkA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XZ2s7Wvon5osvn9eC0rWhczs9ZH/uPRsCoc/MEyf3UQ=; b=RUpkSYKZbRt09sVt62jcDnTdm5bhbIaVxd5hPgiFKPRuof2/cpTgLsDhSo+0TzCC7j uK30QmQ8+4F7RYhJl8Ya54KQvz2XKapXdaQJIDw0qdmWfSJ1J+WUgD3VIA7cYQFK/EXq YmrhM5IvM8Wi19tHoeBeLI85978yOvC9n/vXUVU0Se/QYfZ9vu7TllwTgA4vgh6I+mKx cvnW5vw4QpF3jDmC+mjTybzzezRUgNvv7Xae+68m+6SDDJvI83FRHhlGF09hU4u57CQ7 8PsP5dvTsxWPAi6wvKzbLyuywQsplSewDvoV1IUyV1pVM+W/IZbR+S/iIyn26FBVn2Do GQ4w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530H599PvEVMnLVru2ydHDJubRDcal0BgbF/47U4PlsecsLeK8Zp Xn2RFt48uFscwWOgYeZn3A1bozQ5JYCVIfBzv96k5w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwOqEipCqUiy3cZYRKIcztgAYSK5dcrP7wIWbSQ3KXk7ad2T1ccrOvtAcIrWeV2bS1Lq48r1vVvzFpJzWqIAUM=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:41d3:: with SMTP id o202mr6418162yba.236.1594902717695; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 05:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <23FA2BA0-43B9-49A3-B288-3ADFCE1D1DB1@isc.org> <CAHbrMsDOyTXyJydro8enSePy9COOfK7AVL6Pqv94YGAGhg41Hg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKC-DJiBw7vDr_KA1sb+ephuagRCT84f1B0PGXJptPiZTh2CSg@mail.gmail.com> <CAN6NTqxGLF0tZ17TX8jy2YWPf=qHhW93=fKETJ4kScJbQUUgxw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKC-DJiMngJonCp2EPrHTWMHwV0VAGquf733YcTZ9JSTFtwAhA@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCipbR9D_Tqc4dW5zARpEgjZ=-b3d6ZywPzo0=jfBedppYw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKW6Ri7K7efEj81nKJq7W0MKyn9rDOL7bLt-zVUokodVfrjAwA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKW6Ri7K7efEj81nKJq7W0MKyn9rDOL7bLt-zVUokodVfrjAwA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 08:31:45 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbrMsC-5wvxsmrzHnrnfUZOG1wQsGmEF2m2jMt4a5vieK7Nyg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dick Franks <rwfranks@gmail.com>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="000000000000f9604205aa8e39f4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/eER-ymKTwGX8lD76sL8LhNYqIZY>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] HTTPS and SVBC key names.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 12:32:00 -0000

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020, 4:07 AM Dick Franks <rwfranks@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Beefed-up example from 5.3, where we know neither the key name nor how to
> interpret the value:
>
>     foosvc.example.net. 3600 IN SVCB    \# 9 000100ff350002beef
>     ; 1 . key65333=...
>

Should this say "TYPE64" instead of SVCB?  Apart from that, this looks right


> Presentation format?
>

key65333=\190\239


> Also, why do (key,value) pairs need to be in ascending order on the wire,
> but can be in any order in the presentation format?
>

The presentation format is optimized for humans and the wire format is
optimized for machines. In particular, when using the named keys it's not
obvious what the numeric ordering is, so keeping them in order when editing
a zone file by hand would be hard.


>
> Dick Franks
> ____________________
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>> DNSOP mailing list
>> DNSOP@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email