Re: [DNSOP] Unexpected behaviour of dig +trace
Evan Hunt <each@isc.org> Wed, 26 March 2014 16:41 UTC
Return-Path: <each@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D49D11A0306 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 09:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a4TM3UiiwdNx for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 09:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:500:60::65]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394BE1A01AB for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 09:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:d::19]) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A452383A7; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 16:41:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from each@isc.org)
Received: by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix, from userid 10292) id CE7B8216C31; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 16:41:32 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 16:41:32 +0000
From: Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Message-ID: <20140326164132.GA32879@isc.org>
References: <20140326092227.GA6898@inet.tu-berlin.de> <CAHw9_iKdNWicD+yWDo8+JkBg=8_V4tc=NpWBxtt3Fm8cjK8FCg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iKdNWicD+yWDo8+JkBg=8_V4tc=NpWBxtt3Fm8cjK8FCg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ah5fgF4iTAdg67Iu9Uef3vZJfvk
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Florian Streibelt <florian@inet.tu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Unexpected behaviour of dig +trace
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 16:41:47 -0000
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 06:52:44PM +0800, Warren Kumari wrote: > "Feature", but does catch many folk by surprise. > I'd written a patch and given it to someone at ISC that makes dig > output a warning message if you hand it both the "+trace" and > "@server" options. Dunno what happened, but never got integrated... My apologies for not sending feedback directly. (That's something we really need to work on.) IIRC, we opted to clarify the documentation rather than add a warning to dig itself. There's also a knowledge base article on this topic at http://tinyurl.com/o37rpgm. -- Evan Hunt -- each@isc.org Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
- [DNSOP] Unexpected behaviour of dig +trace Florian Streibelt
- Re: [DNSOP] Unexpected behaviour of dig +trace Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] Unexpected behaviour of dig +trace Evan Hunt
- Re: [DNSOP] Unexpected behaviour of dig +trace Doug Barton
- Re: [DNSOP] Unexpected behaviour of dig +trace Cathy Almond