Re: [DNSOP] draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-bit

Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 23 November 2015 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916AE1A8AEA; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 08:38:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mD0RHHXKZ2v7; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 08:38:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22a.google.com (mail-qg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F25D71A8AE6; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 08:38:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qgcc31 with SMTP id c31so74290111qgc.3; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 08:38:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=Y8SJqJyGe+v9pw59ZxiFIcx3UD2OG8N1HiLKxW2nhUY=; b=A6DvZHHGUm5y0WVr3q1j7V/QPWms/So6z8gsBc8b9WdWWSFQEnafP6+aaaBtplADEd Q5GyRaLeD6RjMP9jLV0R6NTwzMefZSu/8OE5BZCq2TRFDGjQNv4aTDMf1+e9iw5/TNMv 96J1Y7LTAok9r/G3z2inlYPSBNN6KiOrnopBnaDHwVDm8tCnDAxJSmb58X3apcrkn+1f J60327UCaUq5uz4afEjqtzEAxbxSzpLIWu42ngNojhNP3Z2QPAuYD9/UOAUyRTIJVIFo R8UkxI1RJCwtzmXREApVFYXboAQbdPAoUn0zpaeUDamP3CMVDYc4VxqT/yrUHfH4BTd3 PFbA==
X-Received: by 10.140.255.139 with SMTP id a133mr29667421qhd.103.1448296720122; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 08:38:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.131.118.110] ([173.38.117.94]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c67sm3169997qgd.29.2015.11.23.08.38.37 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Nov 2015 08:38:38 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_550A7EDA-234D-4040-8AE7-272F5F58BB72"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.6b2
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20151122140322.GA3048@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:38:35 -0500
Message-Id: <CCDC3082-52C1-4828-938E-9A1A9AF84A13@gmail.com>
References: <92980115C526994FA99FC622DA515DFB12A5D8B9@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <5651A23A.4070304@gnunet.org> <20151122140322.GA3048@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/bSElGTirwYXy0yD_9-Ry50PTNjo>
Cc: "draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-bit@ietf.org" <draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-bit@ietf.org>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>, Christian Grothoff <grothoff@gnunet.org>, Rajesh Gupta <rajesh.gupta@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-bit
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 16:38:42 -0000

> On Nov 22, 2015, at 9:03 AM 11/22/15, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 12:08:42PM +0100,
> Christian Grothoff <grothoff@gnunet.org> wrote
> a message of 13 lines which said:
> 
>> We have solicited but failed to receive any feedback from the dnsop
>> chairs or list on how to improve/revise the draft. Hence, there are
>> currently no updates.  I continue to await the chairs asking for
>> last call on this.
> 
> It has been said that post-onion drafts won't be considered until
> 6761bis is out <https://www.ietf.org/blog/2015/09/onion/> but it did
> not prevented
> <http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cheshire-homenet-dot-home/> to
> advance: it will be interesting to see how .home is handled.

In what way has draft-cheshire-homenet-dot-home advanced?  I see that a new revision has been published with minor editorial changes, but it still appears to be an individual submission that has not been adopted by any WG.

- Ralph

> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop