IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] 5011-security-considerations and the safetyMargin

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Wed, 15 November 2017 05:52 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CE431294D3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 21:52:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 72AZIln_51Nm for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 21:52:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (unknown [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0CA91243F6 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 21:52:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:370:128:4f95:5348:c746:6554]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F6F4245F9; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 21:52:22 -0800 (PST)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <ybld14kpaz4.fsf@wu.hardakers.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 21:52:19 -0800
In-Reply-To: <ybld14kpaz4.fsf@wu.hardakers.net> (Wes Hardaker's message of "Tue, 14 Nov 2017 17:49:35 -0800")
Message-ID: <yblshdgm6lo.fsf@wu.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/bc1CAWZNL8OEzGHUXwfbEOLcaqQ>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] 5011-security-considerations and the safetyMargin
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 05:52:24 -0000

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> writes:

> After thinking about this for far far too long, I've now switched my own
> opinion to that of 2C

(errr... that should have been "2B")
-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email