[DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-10 and AD

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Tue, 03 April 2018 03:11 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8538D126D05 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 20:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nCiQmabr3AK0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 20:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [149.20.64.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F4FF1243F3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 20:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FA253AB06C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 03:10:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A14316007B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 03:10:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E56C160045 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 03:10:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 5AGOzDCFq258 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 03:10:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [172.30.42.91] (c27-253-115-14.carlnfd2.nsw.optusnet.com.au [27.253.115.14]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C5CD416007A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 03:10:58 +0000 (UTC)
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Message-Id: <039408B0-89EE-4038-B9C9-CBCC35EC24EC@isc.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 13:10:55 +1000
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/dI6b-pgahp1stQ0Ok9hcxr3LY2Y>
Subject: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-10 and AD
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 03:11:01 -0000

Do we really want to test for AD?  How many stub resolvers set DO or AD to elicit a AD response?

Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742              INTERNET: marka@isc.org