IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsop] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-misbehavior-against-aaaa-00.txt

David C Lawrence <tale@dd.org> Thu, 25 March 2004 23:51 UTC

Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu (root@darkwing.uoregon.edu [128.223.142.13]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA03574 for <dnsop-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 18:51:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2PLmMGJ016838 for <dnsop-outgoing@darkwing.uoregon.edu>; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 13:48:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2PLmMvB016828 for dnsop-outgoing; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 13:48:22 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <16482.17270.108649.41751@gro.dd.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 21:27:02 -0500
From: David C Lawrence <tale@dd.org>
To: dnsop@lists.uoregon.edu
Subject: Re: [dnsop] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsop-misbehavior-against-aaaa-00.txt
Sender: owner-dnsop@lists.uoregon.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: David C Lawrence <tale@dd.org>

Someone, "J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@club-internet.fr>, I think, said:

> the meaning of the word "global" differs in American and in English.

This was in response to:

>> DNS has been designed to present a single, globally unique name space

Could someone please elucidate the comment that "global" has different
connotations "in American and in English"?

I mean in this technical context, not with silly examples like how
America has narrowly scoped athletic contests but calls the victors
world champions.
.
dnsop resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/dnsop/index.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email