IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-chapin-additional-reserved-tlds-02.txt

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Wed, 11 March 2015 00:36 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA5B1A90D0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 17:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.012
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.012 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id egkFvxoQTPR7 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 17:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [149.20.64.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CE1E1A90CE for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 17:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC6E349398; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:36:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81442160067; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:43:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (c211-30-175-41.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.175.41]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5230716005D; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:43:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rock.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440172B337C8; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 11:36:23 +1100 (EST)
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <20150302105857.16985.904.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <54F4E124.3010406@gmail.com> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1503022129000.19140@bofh.nohats.ca> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1503031046080.23307@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk> <50B802F4-26D3-4250-BEFE-5C5EAF2093A2@virtualized.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 10 Mar 2015 20:08:54 -0400." <50B802F4-26D3-4250-BEFE-5C5EAF2093A2@virtualized.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 11:36:22 +1100
Message-Id: <20150311003623.440172B337C8@rock.dv.isc.org>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/gc73WgOveBfgacCEV4eq9GCY6WI>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-chapin-additional-reserved-tlds-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 00:36:28 -0000

I suspect as we get more validating resolvers / clients the entire
use of squatted tld zones will go away.

DNSSEC breaks the use of squatted TLDs without doing lots of extra
fragile steps to make it work again.

The standard response to bug reports about this is to say that such
usage was never guarenteed to work.  That if you want a private
domain do it in a namespace you control.

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email