IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: HTTPSSVC record draft

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Wed, 10 July 2019 00:11 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E4E1200C3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 17:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tm4YS5-F2BYI for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 17:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [24.104.150.213]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84DFC120098 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 17:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linux-9daj.localnet (50-255-33-26-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.255.33.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06673892D3; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:11:53 +0000 (UTC)
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Cc: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, Erik Nygren <erik+ietf@nygren.org>, Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:11:52 +0000
Message-ID: <1745437.OzvAMyqktN@linux-9daj>
Organization: none
In-Reply-To: <1845D2AE-4FF2-47B2-A01D-274401A23676@isc.org>
References: <CAKC-DJikByP+wX-GoD6ntpUWTbr6ioJzB4i8nGQL4NtPWePL3g@mail.gmail.com> <CADyWQ+EA4e8ye9e8AWomrXko06cnT+izfqmK+fHLWGB5NBveLg@mail.gmail.com> <1845D2AE-4FF2-47B2-A01D-274401A23676@isc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/gnxbGqsG1vtH5Le0P2jwTwIHaQY>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: HTTPSSVC record draft
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:11:55 -0000

On Tuesday, 9 July 2019 21:49:50 UTC Mark Andrews wrote:
> Which invariable ends up being needed to be split over multiple machines for
> different protocols.  ANAME can’t do that splitting.
> 
> ANAME if it continues to exist needs rules like MX. It also needs to be
> explicitly looked for by the application. Add a flag to getaddrinfo() if
> one wants to make that easier.  The DNS server is the wrong place to do
> this.

+1.

everything other than HTTPS can just use SRV.

ANAME is (should be) toast(ed).

-- 
Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email