Re: [DNSOP] new dnsop related draft: RFC5011 security considerations

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Tue, 02 August 2016 15:15 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15A8D12D7AF for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 08:15:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.188
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.188 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IAiue0uOVg90 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 08:15:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (dawn.hardakers.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:187::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9909012D641 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 08:15:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (wjh.hardakers.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:187:f2de:f1ff:fee6:e6e8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2821D25005; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 08:15:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>
References: <0lfuqoqhd7.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net> <414228DF-9C59-467A-8DA0-0EE98B03BDFD@verisign.com> <0lwpk0p0c6.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net> <CA+nkc8DuE-5r-njhbJ2PUQdy9T1-r_ma3FTJcq+wKm8zTBXHfw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 08:15:47 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CA+nkc8DuE-5r-njhbJ2PUQdy9T1-r_ma3FTJcq+wKm8zTBXHfw@mail.gmail.com> (Bob Harold's message of "Tue, 2 Aug 2016 09:44:09 -0400")
Message-ID: <0lfuqnnqvw.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/hm_adwA8tGKt3sM4jF_WWVO3_t8>
Cc: "wkumari@google.com" <wkumari@google.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, "Wessels, Duane" <dwessels@verisign.com>, Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] new dnsop related draft: RFC5011 security considerations
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 15:15:51 -0000

Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu> writes:

> "zone signer" for that role?

That could probably work.

>  1.  Introduction
> "indented"  should be "intended"
>
> 5.  Denial of Service Attack Considerations
> "validataor" should be "validator"

Fixed, thank you!

(the draft is far from done, but catching those early is always a good thing)
-- 
Wes Hardaker
Parsons