Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC in draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming

"Wessels, Duane" <dwessels@verisign.com> Fri, 22 January 2016 22:44 UTC

Return-Path: <dwessels@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3EE01A8F42 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:44:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id diabplywyKSp for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:44:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-x261.google.com (mail-qg0-x261.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::261]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1142C1A8F3E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:44:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qg0-x261.google.com with SMTP id i20so5017943qgd.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:44:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=verisign-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id :references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language :content-type:content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=B24PpWIx06ePbQ4j7pERSfppxHAJvEAcVsX4eURPhdA=; b=07Y2McHiVN/EPFBDwvcmL70o1IkQMeOMwBNn2+AroAByO8O0rqMjmIXG7A6wtwHfkp N9RM7M6Zy9SYJIqHJupe25zqKD84Jjsw6xJoCk+u0iGh11gQ78MzA7y+sEcfGx6CAyWM FPIZk0F0EJQ5Xu3M0Od3vOtxIlELs+t9Hx7OMlsxeMy32fSJAxAotfXLblaOkVvt0xvD +a5Z/9gV6K38M6ZLskunG9kVKTsEOMH2Vy7WEmZ2O4Zn1OW/ly8nzYI98zVjN2ihBQZH j4IuYnzKUU1BF+5m25s+N1rz6/UX6IfWnwruRUdiXMhGiAvPEXJvXH7vzOarR2hGVXPP vn5Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index :date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language :content-language:content-type:content-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; bh=B24PpWIx06ePbQ4j7pERSfppxHAJvEAcVsX4eURPhdA=; b=QegHSyjcU6KSpGYQbmbSVKOAnjh7N/QzXWtVuRPgeEljxOP3RMgkLy2b7SCRR0z/HF qU30qNTWP3pDylPqPXZ5lHFA0vD+mdgbnB5Jvfc12DjSO3odJf0cFCSiAm7ziNowdRua kezd/JIOYXwL3rZShGRvYUJps6hSVxDe3suDt9azcLL8OoLEjaZbGx7Tzg7M2Uskd4UJ bb7rkDiEmoyNtQwEkjGRHpvL6ApynwnWRZCPmp/zeoMFXeouhzQftz322MHbVPWYvOyX tH3AVgUvaG+/4AMohDNYalx1Cpr71MYwt+t9u2C6yqNJk1sFptA4Rn/r+d31YV5/GiTy ihxQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTHcC7ieSX1Uw96of6ewC/VYU4T9sZV7b0MJP/Oy1A9qvUjIVqSpb8icOPYRxj8Lwha8DbxsXn//dKJwRGuKt7Fm0yz
X-Received: by 10.140.40.37 with SMTP id w34mr6907457qgw.85.1453502669197; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:44:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com (brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com. [72.13.63.42]) by smtp-relay.gmail.com with ESMTPS id g133sm1150116qkb.1.2016.01.22.14.44.28 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:44:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Relaying-Domain: verisign.com
Received: from brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas01 [10.173.152.205]) by brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u0MMiSxI013513 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 22 Jan 2016 17:44:28 -0500
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 17:44:27 -0500
From: "Wessels, Duane" <dwessels@verisign.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Thread-Topic: [DNSOP] DNSSEC in draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming
Thread-Index: AQHRVMQmJ2Hob7DPwEWzKumw1uKSbp8IdysA
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 22:44:27 +0000
Message-ID: <2552EB05-B015-42F6-ABA6-D67B21CEBD4F@verisign.com>
References: <12831BC8-EE53-46C7-80A5-A7DAE651F157@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <12831BC8-EE53-46C7-80A5-A7DAE651F157@vpnc.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <0F87EBD4DE1B084FBBE0BBD5F910A880@verisign.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/iG8QJArLDNrc43MkR7aa465SVNI>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC in draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 22:44:35 -0000

I think I'm okay with "resolvers SHOULD send DO when priming."  Seems like BIND and Unbound already do this.

Do we also need to say that the resolver SHOULD/MUST retry with DO=0 if there is no response to the first priming query?

The more important question may be: what shall the resolver do if validation of the priming response fails? I'm skeptical that we, as a group, will be willing to say that the resolver should refuse to forward any queries to a root unless validation succeeds.

DW

> On Jan 21, 2016, at 7:22 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:
> 
> In Warren's review of the draft, he says:
> 
> I think that resolvers SHOULD send DO, and should try validate (if it gets signed responses). This is pointless at the moment, but if / when we end up with signed root-servers.net (or foo.bar) it would be nice if the right things were already being done.
> 
> This seems like a good start for a discussion.
> 
> --Paul Hoffman
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop