Re: [DNSOP] Anycast and DNS questions

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Wed, 27 August 2014 10:16 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 646A11A048C for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 03:16:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.641
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.641 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WVJ2UmQjFdli for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 03:16:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EFDF01A046C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 03:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 17028 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2014 10:06:05 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 27 Aug 2014 10:06:05 -0000
Message-ID: <53FDB011.2020404@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 19:16:49 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <20140806114759.GF5546@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140806114759.GF5546@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/jLJQJJgPGVvuJe-0gIufOqaH8oo
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Anycast and DNS questions
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:16:54 -0000

Toerless Eckert wrote:

> c) Any example in which the DNS servers utilizing a single shared
>     IP address (anycast address) are run by different operators ? Any
>     documents describing this ?

   draft-ietf-dnsop-ohta-shared-root-server-00.txt

   This memo proposes a mechanism of policy based selection of a root
   server sharing an IP address (anycast IP address) with other root
   servers and discusses operational issues related to it.

   Because the selection is policy based, domain administrators  have
   some control over the selection of the best root server among root
   servers sharing an IP address.

   Note that operations similar to that described in this memo are
   possible today locally without global coordination by any operator
   who may be irritated by the lack of his control on (sufficiently
   many) root servers, which may be a source of some operational
   problems. This memo is an attempt to document the way to solve the
   problem in a least harmful manner.


> (RFC3258 seems to focus on single operator
>     anycast group of DNS servers.

Hardie insisted on his original proposal, even though I
gave a proof that it is not necessary.

					Masataka Ohta