Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-revalidation-06.txt

Florian Obser <florian+ietf@narrans.de> Mon, 18 March 2024 07:02 UTC

Return-Path: <florian+ietf@narrans.de>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F26C14F5F1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 00:02:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nIQ1ILgGsIkp for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 00:02:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imap.narrans.de (michelangelo.narrans.de [45.77.55.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CCD9C14F69E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 00:01:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by michelangelo.narrans.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 8c8e2a72 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 08:01:39 +0100 (CET)
From: Florian Obser <florian+ietf@narrans.de>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <171073157523.47754.45386078992453305@ietfa.amsl.com> (internet-drafts@ietf.org's message of "Sun, 17 Mar 2024 20:12:55 -0700")
References: <171073157523.47754.45386078992453305@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 08:01:38 +0100
Message-ID: <m1msqwaur1.fsf@narrans.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ksZ31aXk6AgtK9dzhuClbblbdGA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-revalidation-06.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 07:02:27 -0000

On 2024-03-17 20:12 -07, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-revalidation-06.txt is now available. It is

| 7.  Security Considerations
| [...]
| In case of non DNSSEC validating
| resolvers, an attacker controlling a rogue name server for the root
| has potentially complete control over the entire domain name space
| and can alter all unsigned parts undetected.

can alter *all* parts undetected.

It's a non-DNSSEC validating resolver, it doesn't care about signed or
unsigned. Maybe just drop that sentence, it doesn't add much.

-- 
In my defence, I have been left unsupervised.