IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-andrews-dns-no-response-issue in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net> Sat, 28 November 2015 08:06 UTC

Return-Path: <ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B7941B315B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 00:06:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.566
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.566 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9_yZ2L0atKgW for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 00:06:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from abenaki.wabanaki.net (nike.wampumpeag.net [67.42.198.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 972A11B315A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 00:06:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frog.local ([67.42.198.93]) by abenaki.wabanaki.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id tAS869JK060919 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 00:06:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net)
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <20151112185822.20185.55205.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0DE7C85E-C2F9-4569-BD5E-11896DB727D5@dnss.ec> <CAHw9_iKDQXvaX4cwbpMSF0EPtYsW=zgRs2FWNdmfrL3Njn8F-w@mail.gmail.com> <20151128055422.GI18315@mournblade.imrryr.org>
From: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net>
Message-ID: <56596071.9020603@abenaki.wabanaki.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 00:06:09 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20151128055422.GI18315@mournblade.imrryr.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/nGHU6t4mQKXLHqWhpUBR44G7tQY>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-andrews-dns-no-response-issue in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 08:06:11 -0000

As informational (BCP), of course (see below). As advice to TLD 
operators uniformly, I'm unconvinced, but listening.

On 11/27/15 9:54 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 05:20:05PM +0000, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:51 PM Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec> wrote:
>>
>>> I support the general concept (responsive servers are often better
>>> netizens) and will review the draft, so I support this draft for WG
>>> adoption.
>> Yah, me too.
> Count me in.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email