Re: [DNSOP] Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming-04
Hosnieh Rafiee <hosnieh.rafiee@huawei.com> Mon, 15 September 2014 11:43 UTC
Return-Path: <hosnieh.rafiee@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1191A0B0B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 04:43:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.853
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.853 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.652, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1K53i25bNU7c for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 04:43:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FFFB1A030C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 04:43:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BMP03219; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 11:43:36 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML513-MBX.china.huawei.com ([10.201.4.199]) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.201.5.243]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:43:32 +0100
From: Hosnieh Rafiee <hosnieh.rafiee@huawei.com>
To: "cet1@cam.ac.uk" <cet1@cam.ac.uk>
Thread-Topic: [DNSOP] Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming-04
Thread-Index: Ac/OfICLxCPvCMv6RbCZWvGGw+srDgCU/uCAAAJhyhA=
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 11:43:32 +0000
Message-ID: <814D0BFB77D95844A01CA29B44CBF8A7A3385E@lhreml513-mbx>
References: <814D0BFB77D95844A01CA29B44CBF8A7A2C341@lhreml513-mbb.china.huawei.com> <Prayer.1.3.5.1409151233270.14435@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <Prayer.1.3.5.1409151233270.14435@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.221.82.100]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/pUv7bEvHiONcB5_fKx_cbxKy7GM
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming-04
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 11:43:42 -0000
> for a 12-octet overhead. Maybe a reference to RFC 1035 section 3.2.1 is > needed to clarify? (although this 12-octet minimum overhead is rather > "well known") I guess yes. Because in your text it appears that you only considered that combination but actually you meant the whole message and it was a bit confusing. Best, Hosnieh
- [DNSOP] Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-primi… Hosnieh Rafiee
- Re: [DNSOP] Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-p… Chris Thompson
- Re: [DNSOP] Review of draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-p… Hosnieh Rafiee