IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption: draft-hardaker-rfc5011-security-considerations

william manning <chinese.apricot@gmail.com> Thu, 16 March 2017 14:24 UTC

Return-Path: <chinese.apricot@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87BED129492 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 07:24:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3vgLXywshvLx for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 07:24:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x234.google.com (mail-it0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9572B12948C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 07:24:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x234.google.com with SMTP id m27so45237831iti.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 07:24:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=a5KCJYSozO/t2Yrh3SDkj+iHisrxnV0S6EltXTzCdb0=; b=KWNi04OtgXD0rsOglV7a9E19rSkjo9cDtKUvQXUf30VV/neyVz/G7I25xMzHfulB0b YOStKpjb7V0GxRfi+h07P94d+VtgPmvtYMjEUXTEuCdhFeoklfVyoLvElByXzzzZSexQ CaEnLft7sMz4EciBKkHAbm5xjeTxOriJr74XGuFRyLCzHJAIuAnI+BxVVNzWlKVa6Vri UYEz3X5SdR2xO9/5yTwdxGVeym6z9xdqQZtIoo9shSmgZ6gR9hgcW11ZFaZ4+ItTGI2M gDgIKBME7RKOwWg0qBEHwDDB80MLTKmDnUTH706CPILeaxvG0fsMVLPjLHQ6UXm85HCC a07g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=a5KCJYSozO/t2Yrh3SDkj+iHisrxnV0S6EltXTzCdb0=; b=WJdiI5CDNqN+To455G1OlPThtuCh1MOrho4YADXp9tPYnFbzudS3j3HMzx1AYVI4GH ZBOeebxq6RBQq6oD7XRAyIQRBcgeimi3BhxUinqunSlRK2omyDybKy05+todPH6besDP +npJTb8lQscX8x5+EbydtBq8jsJdAdDwJg3gzBlUsicLj6ON+LjLY9cjqyJM2skqvhPq hqDw/g1MyIeJkmHPJTexyAYarr9YeDLfoyOxVmciuDdXjZvShmP2m/XmMmxCNYS1BOcp eOTTpNG7aB/z4s9AYS4TRQUkjM+S3JDqKdhWA1V6rdCrTjjj/93O9OE4OlYLE4JdgxhR YUZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3bYUtJQ4Xf0NsJu39iv8OxwQDxuTo0XKSocWBkK64btzqjhDg0dKosQlL2hzHrYtllj49h4BjFO6NJmQ==
X-Received: by 10.36.14.77 with SMTP id 74mr10042398ite.115.1489674275240; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 07:24:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.159.136 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 07:24:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+ECthEmWxDbc717BMQo_=PMxz9M0vthDxjOpNW_M7XPTw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADyWQ+ECthEmWxDbc717BMQo_=PMxz9M0vthDxjOpNW_M7XPTw@mail.gmail.com>
From: william manning <chinese.apricot@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 07:24:34 -0700
Message-ID: <CACfw2hirC1jr+DMGmm9OVmP9OjqDEf_k6_kyWhE1ri3gWpFDHQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1143d75601d673054ad9d242"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/qPJ_zKc74i3eCqCpztUyJpbQMoE>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption: draft-hardaker-rfc5011-security-considerations
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 14:24:45 -0000

this is a useful and needed document.  I support its adoption by the WG.
As a note to the authors, there was a proposed alternate to what became RFC
5011 which addressed some of the same issues as the current draft. It might
be useful to review
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsext-trustupdate-threshold-01
going forward.

/Wm

On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:16 AM, tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> All
>
> We've had a lot of WG discussion on this, and it seems relevant to do a
> formal call for adoption.   If there are outstanding issues raised during
> the CfA, time in Chicago will be set aside to have those discussions.
>
>
> This starts a Call for Adoption for:  draft-hardaker-rfc5011-
> security-considerations
>
> The draft is available here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hardaker-rfc5011-
> security-considerations/
>
> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption
> by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
>
> Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc.
>
> If there are
>
> This call for adoption ends: 30 March 2017
>
> Thanks,
> tim wicinski
> DNSOP co-chair
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email