IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Caching of negative zone (non-authoritative) responses

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 08 July 2019 17:13 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FE2F120386 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 10:13:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.604
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.604 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PDS_NO_HELO_DNS=1.295, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uSFMuKSf1Zth for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 10:13:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72f.google.com (mail-qk1-x72f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EB75120378 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 10:13:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72f.google.com with SMTP id v22so13881805qkj.8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 10:13:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=RcAWUdt9lUgCSCKNzE1KC1OJ6IQOiOJp84sQOglpuzo=; b=ettrh5jVDWIchKv7KuYgzhiS7qsXHaXynAPKMbQ4+USs0TFgKhfUFgoSwZ+PAaparU 57DJ/LvpUL5GJpgYMS3gylaCQsTxxTwvrm3OiZVCHHFW0cnEHaMAiJlJCBifgnrkafMa lKlmsqyM86mXHEMsPzUSDQ/F37XSH9ETmw70SmPoDmAMrNckKX5W9fSRjTahXQnZt56V TA36Ytri1xSU62bQNOI35Px11AeTKVQrfmuTDIqN1Rq1YNn6Jg+8SzU8KMUUKyojjQhQ nH+0Rb2Jpldp1M+LckxybdCmLSH2qOTT6E/fOFKY17Wu9/c4wuHPoVrPvdf1D4ouWnob WOhQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=RcAWUdt9lUgCSCKNzE1KC1OJ6IQOiOJp84sQOglpuzo=; b=o61WfjY+KChQLRhpqrX10vYNWl3rwF4KQtR8V1PN7akaH00GhWLL2mWD3Ad0R5ITn2 gGfgVeg+0iJEufpyuJE3Bb3DW/VDAjPvvGMTLFd7QyLKZhbD+MB3oHXeUrP/r/hH7nHR zle/PgvC5Dd+LBa775aRtcehV3s5X7DKWmzbY8y2POXHcJ7AasneA2Mii1OaAfQrUAGS zi3X927vpgzMz6EBhhI7kwv5viWTWGwb6t0T95uvsZuWjA0KzsxpiIMNsOp6zeYr/WnI FoYV7f2US6xnxveU1lBsbAlAG1HMnZqESA+1EM9eMLcy7QjY2bLOV9OIVUiyKR8Yw4Tz SyPA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX0Sq5vUf0VznKYDHk3DMTikyny2ABUYOPK7GntXKke/zhA0kvd wMonp8QJ2ev3v9npF/TcjtyTrA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy0mQbIRRJVsqLqLt1HtU6UjpqQq9GBLknV7n7zye005EB+vyzgv66EAlaSgvBa8jglRruxDA==
X-Received: by 2002:ae9:c00f:: with SMTP id u15mr10922092qkk.426.1562605991233; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 10:13:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:470:c1a2:1:450d:3b0b:90d3:8924? ([2001:470:c1a2:1:450d:3b0b:90d3:8924]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n3sm7903676qkk.54.2019.07.08.10.13.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Jul 2019 10:13:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <B2A16703-4AF4-4CA5-843D-3C3E09866225@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2536E71C-06AB-4AF1-BE79-1C0AF449E818"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 13:13:08 -0400
In-Reply-To: <901d1ddf-bd6a-4c83-4ec4-0c8b5f47d48b@godaddy.com>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
To: "Michael J. Sheldon" <msheldon@godaddy.com>
References: <BYAPR02MB51900835E25A720BB9BF23C8DBF60@BYAPR02MB5190.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <4D5516C6-924C-4A88-8EC2-C79DA2B48293@fugue.com> <901d1ddf-bd6a-4c83-4ec4-0c8b5f47d48b@godaddy.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/sx2nz5UEeG49wSTFdUEMJD6EmEo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Caching of negative zone (non-authoritative) responses
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2019 17:13:22 -0000

On Jul 8, 2019, at 1:04 PM, Michael J. Sheldon <msheldon@godaddy.com> wrote:
> Neither solution
> is good, and the second one, while probably justifiable, does not feel
> "legit" to me, and results in longer-term data maintenance issues.

So this is a former customer who stopped paying but still has a valid registration?   This seems like it would be straightforward to automate.  I think it’s legit to configure your server to answer authoritatively for the zone as long as the delegation exists.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email