Re: [DNSOP] Deprecating the status opcode

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Wed, 15 May 2019 12:00 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D04881200F4 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2019 05:00:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CBlNkNEyUlpV for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2019 05:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (shaun.rfc1035.com [93.186.33.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 945081200EA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2019 05:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gromit.rfc1035.com (gromit.rfc1035.com [195.54.233.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 80DCB24205E6; Wed, 15 May 2019 12:00:32 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <ecf35601-a2e6-df28-352c-427b39d892c0@time-travellers.org>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 13:00:31 +0100
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8C30EFAB-6D28-4B71-83FC-A038BA82F8B3@rfc1035.com>
References: <064BA295-F3DD-46E4-86A9-E03CF68EB6BC@sinodun.com> <ecf35601-a2e6-df28-352c-427b39d892c0@time-travellers.org>
To: Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/tQbltGjB08Y9_mgXKHhFTfKxkYE>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Deprecating the status opcode
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 12:00:36 -0000


> On 15 May 2019, at 12:55, Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org>; wrote:
> 
> This seems like the most non-controversial document ever in the history of documents.

A non-controversial DNS doc at the IETF? That’ll be a first. :-)