Re: [DNSOP] draft-yoneya-dnssec-kskro-failure-recovery-01

Paul Wouters <paul@cypherpunks.ca> Fri, 07 September 2012 14:55 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@cypherpunks.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028DD21E80C3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 07:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kK90NyEjkLRA for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 07:55:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E5921E80B4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 07:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 500) id 118B08048B; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 10:54:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C6C80399; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 10:54:49 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 10:54:49 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@cypherpunks.ca>
X-X-Sender: paul@bofh.nohats.ca
To: Yoshiro YONEYA <yoshiro.yoneya@jprs.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20120907165257.707be51b06da9a1623f6338e@jprs.co.jp>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1209071053120.24205@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <504789CA.6040703@nthpermutation.com> <20120906173616.f83c7580ca0c4e1439092747@jprs.co.jp> <20120906090839.GF83242@macbook.bluepipe.net> <alpine.LFD.2.02.1209061029370.13616@bofh.nohats.ca> <20120907165257.707be51b06da9a1623f6338e@jprs.co.jp>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-yoneya-dnssec-kskro-failure-recovery-01
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 14:55:45 -0000

On Fri, 7 Sep 2012, Yoshiro YONEYA wrote:

> The document intent to describe what to do when child zone administrator
> failed to do KSK rollover.  It also intent to advice to parent zone
> administrator for that case.  I think this concept is not included in
> rfc4641bis.

A lot of what can be done there will be framed by lawyers, not
engineers. I agree 4641bis tells you how to not get at a failed
rollover state. I just don't see much value in a document that
tells you what to do when you ignored 4641bis.

Paul