Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-client-subnet-04.txt> (Client Subnet in DNS Queries) to Informational RFC
神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> Tue, 08 December 2015 18:21 UTC
Return-Path: <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE181A1A5A; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 10:21:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0ZSujefreA_b; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 10:21:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22f.google.com (mail-ig0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3F9D1A1A80; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 10:21:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by igbxm8 with SMTP id xm8so23173421igb.1; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 10:21:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=m4vMPlWq0JsH3D7n4ETUI3Xpp9wrKVuPStX3Yp6iKRs=; b=EgnlKIANagTwGm2BaiYxRcNvyM9wn81zmjerFzE/GvzfYVnJFUGTdAGRviNCunI2FO qp1D4gDNKn+bs3N12/p/BwYTj+Q4PAkQK0kEu1jn1h3hG2eTytQTgJKyNlRhLPaxHfVk KYzYlddcubnEEosVH79Ukt5IrEjhOtj3Cm7bUynny4fFQLiWorSJY99SaSr6nt08pYLv 8tqENxQ4YillMcF26NQePwo0Fv5VfYtXJTERRMqGUOar54T4yarda0zGmmBdx1sFdxfh Ose1P7cgJGoJh7h67LqzpH+GyB5HB3INskXzjhubQSZjMhVkR5S0LxZqwqRwHhc7y4ol x6fQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.152.98 with SMTP id ux2mr21595558igb.64.1449598886179; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 10:21:26 -0800 (PST)
Sender: jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.47.217 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 10:21:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20151207190759.18609.71408.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20151207190759.18609.71408.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 10:21:26 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: -7tyQAjVucdh0wtD26VTg48ELVo
Message-ID: <CAJE_bqcuAEzK_Jd8SNMcUNJvBin=MRcLJqrqZpfYcPWBO4+UnA@mail.gmail.com>
From: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ts0GtH603G3xcGQJncAq3vkIcrU>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>, draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-client-subnet@ietf.org, joelja@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-client-subnet-04.txt> (Client Subnet in DNS Queries) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 18:21:28 -0000
At Mon, 07 Dec 2015 11:07:59 -0800, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote: > The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name System Operations WG > (dnsop) to consider the following document: > - 'Client Subnet in DNS Queries' > <draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-client-subnet-04.txt> as Informational RFC > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2015-12-21. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. I made several comments on the draft during the dnsop WGLC: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg15575.html and my impression at that time was that authors agreed on addressing at least some of the points. But the 04 version obviously doesn't address these as it was released before my comment message. I don't know/remember precisely what has happened since that discussion, but unless the decision was that the authors decided to completely dismiss these points, I hope these will be addressed in the IETF last call phase. -- JINMEI, Tatuya