Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-huston-kskroll-sentinel

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Thu, 16 November 2017 11:05 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A59129459 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 03:05:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1HwoQ9_QOaLh for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 03:05:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86175129420 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 03:05:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ycz1l62dKz34k; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 12:05:47 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1510830347; bh=saiSqUQ2qUXedNqe5l68fm90j9jOOU/7PjtKMFJj6vU=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=Z7gOkwL7x/vDC4++FHFtLSKSJ9py+K2e+LJTjS6EQnJCyYcJG53vxFXTu67Ja4zEa r0BI2S6fa6J6t2u6q6Yz0l5E2YlsLkijlTA5qO1tW1o3IrB1GLQZ2QPwTTK+MbdJfp 0AmnxH28LLMTKc0kPquGKkddQ8QXhrp6dUHBIJnE=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wjzVanwBj32x; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 12:05:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 12:05:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 135C662D29; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 06:05:40 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca 135C662D29
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id F10F240D35AF; Thu, 16 Nov 2017 06:05:40 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 06:05:40 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+Fhzybt-aNNF+yJxQfWDM56W+rzWxZ2YB3yf6wy4m_uxA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1711160604270.23221@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <CADyWQ+Fhzybt-aNNF+yJxQfWDM56W+rzWxZ2YB3yf6wy4m_uxA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/vKCr7mYzLMJPhi79ayHE2HdVmNk>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-huston-kskroll-sentinel
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 11:05:52 -0000

On Thu, 16 Nov 2017, tjw ietf wrote:

> The author has rolled out a new version addressing comments from the meeting on Monday, and we feel it’s ready to move this along.
> 
> This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-huston-kskroll-sentinel
> 
> The draft is available here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-huston-kskroll-sentinel/
> 
> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.

In favour of adopting, but still confused about parts of the draft. But
I agree with the idea.

> Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc.

willing to review.

Paul