IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Why new code/old keys? Re: [Ext] Re: sentinel and timing?

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Thu, 08 February 2018 17:18 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2106812D830 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 09:18:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3spDw1e-x4d1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 09:18:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [24.104.150.213]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D300112D7FC for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 09:18:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:559:8000:c9:20e3:e8bd:ee44:7bb4] (unknown [IPv6:2001:559:8000:c9:20e3:e8bd:ee44:7bb4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B13C7594C; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 17:18:53 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5A7C867C.8060803@redbarn.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 09:18:52 -0800
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.22 (Windows/20171208)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sthaug@nethelp.no
CC: edward.lewis@icann.org, dnsop@ietf.org
References: <564E7616-6B47-48E2-B3DC-68A22032F441@icann.org> <20180208.152419.74654265.sthaug@nethelp.no>
In-Reply-To: <20180208.152419.74654265.sthaug@nethelp.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/y5fmvmudwOZGIOlFmlGpjTM_AaI>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Why new code/old keys? Re: [Ext] Re: sentinel and timing?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 17:18:55 -0000


sthaug@nethelp.no wrote:
> Speaking only for myself - I have done many BIND upgrades without config
> file changes (and I basically expect this to work).

i apologize, again, for the config file from last-bind8, not working in 
all cases with first-bind9. i don't work at ISC any more, but i think i 
can safely predict that this won't happen again.

-- 
P Vixie

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email