Re: [DNSOP] terminology: glue

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Tue, 05 May 2015 14:45 UTC

Return-Path: <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D351B2B0E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 May 2015 07:45:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.312
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.312 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zaVL4kA3envn for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 May 2015 07:45:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-50.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-50.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 857F31A1A7F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2015 07:45:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.51]:36476) by ppsw-50.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.158]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:fanf2) id 1Ype6C-0007bt-pi (Exim 4.82_3-c0e5623) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Tue, 05 May 2015 15:45:28 +0100
Received: from fanf2 by hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local id 1Ype6B-0006aw-V9 (Exim 4.72) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Tue, 05 May 2015 15:45:27 +0100
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 15:45:27 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-X-Sender: fanf2@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk
To: Casey Deccio <casey@deccio.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAEKtLiTq_OLY_aPqdntwHCQV0m64T=1wuDNRbtnLGi01bb90qw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1505051535430.23307@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <CAEKtLiTq_OLY_aPqdntwHCQV0m64T=1wuDNRbtnLGi01bb90qw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LSU 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: Tony Finch <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/yDMm2JR5LFKEP8QaErkAppphNFI>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] terminology: glue
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 14:45:33 -0000

Casey Deccio <casey@deccio.net> wrote:
>
> Glue records -- "[Records] which are not part of the
>    authoritative data [for a zone], and are address resource records for
>    the servers [in a subzone].  These RRs are only necessary if the name
>    server's name is 'below' the cut, and are only used as part of a
>    referral response."  Without glue "we could be faced with the situation
>    where the NS RRs tell us that in order to learn a name server's
>    address, we should contact the server using the address we wish to
>    learn." (Definition from RFC 1034, section 4.2.1)
>
>    A later definition is that glue "includes any record in a zone file
>    that is not properly part of that zone, including nameserver records
>    of delegated sub-zones (NS records), address records that accompany
>    those NS records (A, AAAA, etc), and any other stray data that might
>    appear" ([RFC2181], section 5.4.1).  Although glue is sometimes used
>    today with this wider definition in mind, the context surrounding the
>    RFC 2181 definition suggests it is intended to apply to the use of glue
>    within document itself and not necessarily beyond.

I like this wording.

Re "other stray data", can we conclude if it includes or excludes
occluded records (as in RFC 6672 section 5.2 and RFC 2136 paragraph 7.18)?

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Fair Isle: Easterly 4 or 5 becoming cyclonic 6 to gale 8, occasionally severe
gale 9 later in west. Moderate becoming rough or very rough, then high later
in far west. Rain, fog patches. Moderate or good, occasionally very poor.