[DNSOP] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-08: (with COMMENT)

[Robert Wilton via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi,

Thanks for this document.  I'm not an expert on DNS, and hence found it
slightly harder to read.

Minor level comments:

(1) p 2, sec 2.  Terminology

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
   14 [RFC2119][RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.

Is there a reference to generic DNS terminology that could be imported here. 
This may aid readers less familiar with DNS.

Nit level comments:

(2) p 12, sec 6.  Implementation and operational Notes

     For example
   if the catalog is generated by some script and this script for
   whatever reason generates an empty catalog, millions of member zones
   may get deleted from their secondaries within seconds and all the
   affected domains may be offline in a blink.

Minor bit, but I would expect the phrase to be "in a blink of an eye".

Regards,
Rob