Re: [dnssd] Call for agenda items: DNSSD at IETF 105 in Montreal

Ted Lemon <> Tue, 09 July 2019 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEEF61202D0 for <>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 09:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.604
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.604 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PDS_NO_HELO_DNS=1.295, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OOQZuLI2U5mW for <>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 09:41:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E0A71206A2 for <>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 09:41:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id g18so16522397qkl.3 for <>; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 09:41:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=AOi19T3dvmct+CoPa3PWrdkKZ9ATmrnSoAkTnSATOiI=; b=N9jpYfscjjXgwI8hUhG3VWBfP6ScI44mHyV6D7LEQIgDIAXzjwbSLi3SFhcX4kiq45 vGWsa1uoqXBzn+H7hFeqh9Z6r6jK3kbBEVlxww3O9hY7h09bL3ZDhXzIfXsfJ9jRnb2k AgIlvYglPgy1JZRj6YLi3WreNXI9XnTVxPBh8l84OtMZO/XVUKA4QNVjs1o2uF0hTiUM FthYq0wZgj4QLbXT79OUxu5uWXROFokbaub4hzjLHfpzAw9BIQDkA3T+CKTZq76ZmKNh O4G4iiE5ziQuHTMAUY+cd01japw5Sr31oFOKLIJLbvvz4jEhdS/IFPQaEX9O4FkoZoSr xq6g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=AOi19T3dvmct+CoPa3PWrdkKZ9ATmrnSoAkTnSATOiI=; b=EbzKoUZxu8mN0e2btGNpEKJYvnnuQxY+8wVHikCM6qVHuXuHFp5/DKLLyS0+f4Yzr6 gtqQf1erwAe0ivJst3JvNRYc7h+e8SdszyHJwT+0dMegpRAKR8X4+6oLXD32VrBW+dHv 3GrWTShTV4D1ILs5jmjXDzcAMoed0e+u5zq+j7Egd4Z+qe6FuUXeiYU9JT8QUr/WF5Pk fKIf4eX1wCmm2GMF2Q0PShHW6UWzA9kYop/HOlWzVCLu/llkW+dZf4fPEYe4ZxvhoS/Z afNU3i2gVNgnnhAufaOoqZa/rdFoVu5MigEjKtSTp7ohsQypXTL03+W2w7NbXqCDTlQ5 MLcg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX4LGaOhubvlxZqnddLxi/uPr+XNHxrATRdpg+bZl1sm7eu322e iwy26R9COTyN9Zu2kd1WHN9rpA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwVvD+XlphqH7HlPG7ZwBTVe1onghrxOxpeTb2jRQtqPTK4TtLIVAL60xmy8AWj+oT53xqvAQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:7a84:: with SMTP id v126mr18657462qkc.439.1562690464464; Tue, 09 Jul 2019 09:41:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:470:c1a2:1:1dd2:b78f:3be7:8c79? ([2001:470:c1a2:1:1dd2:b78f:3be7:8c79]) by with ESMTPSA id b5sm6273206qkk.78.2019. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Jul 2019 09:41:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <>
Message-Id: <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8D64DB6E-828D-4008-ADAD-73154444E82D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 12:41:02 -0400
In-Reply-To: <>
Cc: DNSSD <>,
To: David Schinazi <>
References: <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [dnssd] Call for agenda items: DNSSD at IETF 105 in Montreal
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to DNS-based service discovery for routed networks." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 16:41:13 -0000

I could talk about any of the following things:

The DNSSD-SRP draft status (draft-ietf-dnssd-srp)
What updates have happened
What to do about Tom’s comments on the DNSSD-SRP draft that I haven’t addressed
What to do with the draft generally
Implementation report
DNSSD-Push implementation report (draft-ietf-dnssd-hybrid-proxy)
DNSSD Relay implementation status (draft-ietf-dnssd-mdns-relay)

I could also demo DNSSD Push if there’s interest.

The implementation reports should take on the order of five minutes.   The demo would probably take another five.   The draft status update shouldn’t take more than 10.   Stuart or one of the other authors might additionally want to talk about DNSSD Push status, since there’s been activity on that in IETF last call, but I’m not an author, so I’m not proposing to do that.