Re: [dnssd] Some possible agenda items for Brisbane

[Ted Lemon <[e-mail]>]

Sgtm. Thanks!

Op ma 4 mrt 2024 om 21:12 schreef David Schinazi <[e-mail]>

> Thanks Ted! As always, quite impressive progress on draft deadline day :-)
>
> Based on what we've gathered so far, I think a potential agenda could be:
>
> # WG documents
>
> * draft-ietf-dnssd-multi-qtypes - Ray Bellis
>
> * draft-ietf-dnssd-srp - Ted Lemon
>     (quick summary of changes during IESG review)
>
> * draft-ietf-dnssd-advertising-proxy - Ted Lemon
>
> * draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-replication - Ted Lemon
>
> # Individual Drafts
>
> * draft-tllq-tsr - Ted Lemon
>
> * draft-tlmd-push-dnssd-additional - Di Ma
>
> My thinking was to order the documents from closest to furthest to
> publication, with the exception of multi-qtypes because we've been asked to
> put that first so some DNSOP enthusiasts can join for just that one.
>
> Since the DNSSD session this time around is joint with SNAC, we'll
> coordinate with the SNAC chairs to finalize the agenda, but if anyone has
> thoughts or comments, please send them in reply to this email, we'd prefer
> to bash the agenda sooner rather than later.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 5:31 PM Ted Lemon <elemon=
> [e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> SRP has been updated, I think we're done, there's one last nit we could
>> talk about, which is, should we require single-hop protection. This was
>> raised by the transport area review, IIRC, and has also been raised on the
>> list. So we definitely have an excuse to do this as part of IESG review if
>> we want.
>>
>> I just updated TSR to reflect what I talked about in Prague.
>>
>> I just updated advertising proxy to reflect what I talked about in Prague.
>>
>> Jonathan just updated replication.
>>
>> Di Ma and I talked in Prague about doing an extension to DNS Push, and it
>> turned out we were thinking about different things, but anyway we have a
>> draft that might be worth presenting, and is actual new work the WG hasn't
>> seen before, with a co-author who isn't all FAANGy, so that's cool. The -00
>> is published as draft-tlmd-push-dnssd-additional-00 (
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tlmd-push-dnssd-additional/).
>>
>> I think that's everything I know about. We definitely have a bunch of
>> remaining work to do. I've mostly talked about the stuff that's in the
>> document updates already, so it would mostly be status updates, but we
>> haven't had a lot of discussion about some of the ideas I presented in
>> Prague (e.g. subdomains of local as a way to avoid collisions).
>>
>> So, if there is energy to participate in these discussions, that would be
>> great.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dnssd mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dnssd mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnssd
>